Access to Cancer Screening in People with Learning Disabilities in the UK: Cohort Study in the Health Improvement Network, a Primary Care Research Database

被引:45
|
作者
Osborn, David P. J. [1 ]
Horsfall, Laura [2 ]
Hassiotis, Angela [1 ]
Petersen, Irene [2 ]
Walters, Kate [2 ]
Nazareth, Irwin [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Mental Hlth Sci Unit, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0043841
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess whether people with learning disability in the UK have poorer access to cancer screening. Design: Four cohort studies comparing people with and without learning disability, within the recommended age ranges for cancer screening in the UK. We used Poisson regression to determine relative incidence rates of cancer screening. Setting: The Health Improvement Network, a UK primary care database with over 450 General practices. Participants: Individuals with a recorded diagnosis of learning disability including general diagnostic terms, specific syndromes, chromosomal abnormalities and autism in their General Practitioner computerised notes. For each type of cancer screening, a comparison cohort of up to six people without learning disability was selected for each person with a learning disability, using stratified sampling on age within GP practice. Main outcome measures: Incidence rate ratios for receiving 1) a cervical smear test, 2) a mammogram, 3) a faecal occult blood test and 4) a prostate specific antigen test. Results: Relative rates of screening for all four cancers were significantly lower for people with learning disability. The adjusted incidence rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) were Cervical smears: Number eligible with learning disability = 6,254; IRR = 0.54 (0.52-0.56). Mammograms: Number eligible with learning disability = 2,956; IRR = 0.76 (0.72-0.81); Prostate Specific Antigen: Number eligible = 3,520; IRR = 0.87 (0.80-0.96) and Faecal Occult Blood Number eligible = 6,566; 0.86 (0.78-0.94). Differences in screening rates were less pronounced in more socially deprived areas. Disparities in cervical screening rates narrowed over time, but were 45% lower in 2008/9, those for breast cancer screening appeared to widen and were 35% lower in 2009. Conclusion: Despite recent incentives, people with learning disability in the UK are significantly less likely to receive screening tests for cancer that those without learning disability. Other methods for reducing inequalities in access to cancer screening should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Access to cancer screening in people with learning disabilities in the UK using a primary care database
    Hassiotis, A.
    Osborn, D.
    Horsfall, L.
    Petersen, I.
    Walters, K.
    Nazareth, I.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2012, 56 (7-8) : 763 - 763
  • [2] Access to sexual health care for people with learning disabilities: a service improvement project
    Thomas, Hannah
    Parker, Mateo
    Murray, Judith
    Soni, Suneeta
    Green, Lewis
    Beets, Katie
    Pilkington, Victoria
    Low, Nicola
    Candfield, Sophie
    Jones, Rachael
    Bleiker, Tanya
    Dewsnap, Claire
    Phillips, Matt
    Phillips, David
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2023, 99 (SUPPL_1) : A64 - A64
  • [3] First Diagnosis and Management of Incontinence in Older People with and without Dementia in Primary Care: A Cohort Study Using The Health Improvement Network Primary Care Database
    Grant, Robert L.
    Drennan, Vari M.
    Rait, Greta
    Petersen, Irene
    Iliffe, Steve
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (08)
  • [4] Variation in Recorded Child Maltreatment Concerns in UK Primary Care Records: A Cohort Study Using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database
    Woodman, Jenny
    Freemantle, Nick
    Allister, Janice
    de Lusignan, Simon
    Gilbert, Ruth
    Petersen, Irene
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [5] Prescribing of antipsychotics among people with recorded personality disorder in primary care: a retrospective nationwide cohort study using The Health Improvement Network primary care database
    Hardoon, Sarah
    Hayes, Joseph
    Viding, Essi
    McCrory, Eamon
    Walters, Kate
    Osborn, David
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [6] Barriers to access to cancer screening for people with learning disabilities: a review
    Connolly, Jennifer
    LANCET, 2013, 382 : 29 - 29
  • [7] DISCONTINUATION OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS IN PREGNANCY: A UK POPULATION BASED STUDY IN THE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT NETWORK PRIMARY CARE DATABASE
    Man, S.
    Petersen, I.
    Thompson, M.
    Nazareth, I.
    EPILEPSIA, 2012, 53 : 6 - 6
  • [8] An Audit of Patients Transferred Out of the Health Improvement Network (THIN) - A UK Primary Care Database
    Myland, Melissa
    Ansell, David
    Nasser, Ahmed
    Hill, Fiona
    O'Leary, Caroline J.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 540 - 540
  • [9] Exploration of trends in the incidence and prevalence of childhood maltreatment and domestic abuse recording in UK primary care: a retrospective cohort study using 'the health improvement network' database
    Chandan, Joht Singh
    Gokhale, Krishna Margadhamane
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah
    Bandyopadhyay, Siddhartha
    Taylor, Julie
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06): : e036949
  • [10] Access to health services for people with disabilities: the perspective of primary health care professionals and managers
    Miranda, Gabriella Morais Duarte
    Koptcke, Luciana Sepulveda
    de Albuquerque, Maria do Socorro Veloso
    dos Santos, Maria da Penha Rodrigues
    de Carvalho, Maria Eduarda Lima
    Reichenberger, Veronika
    Kuper, Hannah
    Lyra, Tereza Maciel
    SAUDE E SOCIEDADE, 2024, 33 (02):