Bridge seismic hazard resilience assessment with ensemble machine learning

被引:18
|
作者
Soleimani, Farahnaz [1 ]
Hajializadeh, Donya [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Univ Surrey, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
Bridge seismic performance; Ensemble learning; Seismic hazard analysis; Bridge resilience; DEMAND MODELS; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; FRAGILITY; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; SELECTION; DAMAGE; CHILE;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recent years have seen a paradigm shift in assessing the performance of assets in response to disruptive hazards, in that resilience is seen as a more inclusive and over-arching decision variable. This shift in decision drivers provides a better picture of asset behavior in response to hazardous events such as earthquakes and hurricanes. Since highway bridges are among the most critical and vulnerable components of transportation networks, evaluating their functionality under extreme events leads to well-informed decision-making. Whilst there is an ever-growing interest in resilience-based hazard assessment in a wide range of infrastructure sectors, there is limited attention on identifying resilience drivers as a function of hazard and asset characteristics. To this end, this paper presents a framework for probabilistic resilience assessment of a cohort of common highway bridges subjected to a wide range of ground acceleration intensities. This study presents the first ensemble learning-based predictive model using bagging and boosting techniques to predict resilience index as a function of seismic events and asset characteristics on bridge resilience. The hypermeters and input structure of the predictive model are optimized to reduce complexity and maximize efficiency. The findings show that the proposed model performs with a 75-95% success rate in predicting resilience as a function of structural characteristics and peak ground acceleration. This model provides useful insights on the impact of various parameters and drivers of resilience in concrete box-girder bridges.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 732
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advanced Seismic Hazard Assessment
    Panza, G. F.
    Irikura, K.
    Kouteva, M.
    Peresan, A.
    Wang, Z.
    Saragoni, R.
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 168 (1-2) : 1 - 9
  • [32] Seismic hazard assessment in Armenia
    Balassanian, SY
    Martirosyan, AH
    Nazaretian, SN
    Arakelian, AR
    Avanessian, AS
    Igumnov, VA
    Ruttener, E
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 1998, 18 (03) : 227 - 236
  • [33] Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan
    Muhammad Waseem
    Abdul Lateef
    Irshad Ahmad
    Sarfraz Khan
    Waqas Ahmed
    Journal of Seismology, 2019, 23 : 217 - 242
  • [34] Quantitative seismic hazard assessment
    Virieux, Jean
    Bard, Pierre-Yves
    Modaressi, Hormoz
    EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS, 2007, : 153 - +
  • [35] Seismic hazard assessment for Cyprus
    Zehra Cagnan
    Gulum Birgoren Tanircan
    Journal of Seismology, 2010, 14 : 225 - 246
  • [36] Seismic hazard assessment for Adria
    Slejko, D
    Camassi, R
    Cecic, I
    Herak, D
    Herak, M
    Kociu, S
    Kouskouna, V
    Lapajne, J
    Makropoulos, K
    Meletti, C
    Muço, B
    Papaioannou, C
    Peruzza, L
    Rebez, A
    Scandone, P
    Sulstarova, E
    Voulgaris, N
    Zivcic, M
    Zupancic, P
    ANNALI DI GEOFISICA, 1999, 42 (06): : 1085 - 1107
  • [37] On seismic landslide hazard assessment
    Yang, J.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2007, 57 (08): : 707 - 713
  • [38] Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan
    Waseem, Muhammad
    Lateef, Abdul
    Ahmad, Irshad
    Khan, Sarfraz
    Ahmed, Waqas
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 217 - 242
  • [39] Advanced Seismic Hazard Assessment
    G. F. Panza
    K. Irikura
    M. Kouteva
    A. Peresan
    Z. Wang
    R. Saragoni
    Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2011, 168 : 1 - 9
  • [40] Deterministic seismic hazard assessment
    Panza, GF
    Vaccari, F
    Cazzaro, R
    VRANCEA EARTHQUAKES: TECTONICS, HAZARD AND RISK MITIGATION, 1999, : 269 - 286