Transcriptional robustness and protein interactions are associated in yeast

被引:2
|
作者
Bekaert, Michael [1 ]
Conant, Gavin C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Anim Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Inst Informat, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Aneuploidy Dosage balance; Epistasis; Protein-Protein Interactions; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; GENE BALANCE HYPOTHESIS; NETWORK MOTIFS; DOSAGE-SENSITIVITY; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; EPISTASIS; EXPRESSION; NOISE; DUPLICATIONS; CONTRIBUTE; ANEUPLOIDY;
D O I
10.1186/1752-0509-5-62
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Robustness to insults, both external and internal, is a characteristic feature of life. One level of biological organization for which noise and robustness have been extensively studied is gene expression. Cells have a variety of mechanisms for buffering noise in gene expression, but it is not completely clear what rules govern whether or not a given gene uses such tools to maintain appropriate expression. Results: Here, we show a general association between the degree to which yeast cells have evolved mechanisms to buffer changes in gene expression and whether they possess protein-protein interactions. We argue that this effect bears an affinity to epistasis, because yeast appears to have evolved regulatory mechanisms such that distant changes in gene copy number for a protein-protein interaction partner gene can alter a gene's expression. This association is not unexpected given recent work linking epistasis and the deleterious effects of changes in gene dosage (i.e., the dosage balance hypothesis). Using gene expression data from artificial aneuploid strains of bakers' yeast, we found that genes coding for proteins that physically interact with other proteins show less expression variation in response to aneuploidy than do other genes. This effect is even more pronounced for genes whose products interact with proteins encoded on aneuploid chromosomes. We further found that genes targeted by transcription factors encoded on aneuploid chromosomes were more likely to change in expression after aneuploidy. Conclusions: We suggest that these observations can be best understood as resulting from the higher fitness cost of misexpression in epistatic genes and a commensurate greater regulatory control of them.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetic interactions in yeast: is robustness going bust?
    Kupiec, Martin
    Sharan, Roded
    Ruppin, Eytan
    MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2007, 3 (1)
  • [2] Information processing in the transcriptional regulatory network of yeast: Functional robustness
    Emmert-Streib, Frank
    Dehmer, Matthias
    BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2009, 3
  • [3] Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes in yeast
    Nicolas Simonis
    Jacques van Helden
    George N Cohen
    Shoshana J Wodak
    Genome Biology, 5
  • [4] Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes in yeast
    Simonis, N
    van Helden, J
    Cohen, GN
    Wodak, SJ
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2004, 5 (05)
  • [5] A network of protein–protein interactions in yeast
    Benno Schwikowski
    Peter Uetz
    Stanley Fields
    Nature Biotechnology, 2000, 18 : 1257 - 1261
  • [6] ROBUSTNESS OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION IN YEAST-LIKE MODEL BOOLEAN NETWORKS
    Tugrul, Murat
    Kabakcioglu, Alkan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, 2010, 20 (03): : 929 - 935
  • [7] GENERATING YEAST TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATORS CONTAINING NO YEAST PROTEIN SEQUENCES
    RUDEN, DM
    MA, J
    LI, Y
    WOOD, K
    PTASHNE, M
    NATURE, 1991, 350 (6315) : 250 - 252
  • [8] Transcriptional regulation of the yeast PHO5 gene:: a complex interplay of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions
    Barbaric, S
    Horz, W
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 1998, 100 (03) : 345 - 352
  • [9] Protein:Protein Interactions in Control of a Transcriptional Switch
    Adikaram, Poorni R.
    Beckett, Dorothy
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2013, 425 (22) : 4584 - 4594
  • [10] Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes in yeast.
    Simonis, N
    Wodak, S
    Cohen, G
    van Helden, J
    YEAST, 2003, 20 : S340 - S340