A retrospective analysis of the relationship between changes in serum PSA, palliative response and survival following systemic treatment in a Canadian randomized trial for symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Dowling, AJ
Panzarella, T
Ernst, DS
Neville, AJ
Moore, MJ
Tannock, IF
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Haematol & Med Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Biostat, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[4] Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Hamilton Reg Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
chemotherapy; metastatic prostate cancer; palliative response; prognostic factors; PSA response;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011116626590
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To investigate the relationship between changes in serum PSA, palliative response and survival following systemic treatment for symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Patients and methods: A retrospective review of 161 patients, treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone (M + P) (n = 80), or prednisone alone (P) (n = 81) from a Canadian randomized phase III clinical trial. PSA response was defined by greater than or equal to 50% decline compared to baseline. Palliative response was defined by the primary and secondary endpoints of the trial. All responses were required to be maintained on two visits at least three weeks apart. The Cox proportional hazards model and a landmark analysis (at nine weeks) were used to evaluate survival differences between PSA responders and non-responders. Results: Using an intent-to-treat analysis in which patients with missing PSA data are considered non-responders, 34% of M + P and 11% of P patients achieved a PSA response (P = 0.0001). Nineteen of thirty-six (53%) patients with PSA response and twenty-six of ninety (29%) patients without PSA response achieved a palliative response (P= 0.001 Chi-square test, phi coefficient = 0.28). From the landmark analysis, PSA responders had longer survival than non-responders (P= 0.009). In multivariate analysis, better performance status, higher hemoglobin and PSA response (P < 0.001) predicted for survival, but palliative response did not (P = 0.11). Conclusions: There is significant but imperfect statistical association between PSA response and palliative response. PSA response was associated with longer survival. Patients treated with M + P were more likely to achieve a PSA response and a palliative response than those treated with P.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 778
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Serum PSA half-life as a predictor of survival for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients: Modelization using a standardized set of response criteria
    Banu, Eugeniu
    Banu, Adela
    Medioni, Jacques
    Levy, Eric
    Thiounn, Nicolas
    Mejean, Arnaud
    Andrieu, Jean-Marie
    Oudard, Stephane
    PROSTATE, 2007, 67 (14): : 1543 - 1549
  • [2] Corrected area under serum PSA curve as a predictor of survival after chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients.
    Oudard, S
    Banu, E
    Thiounn, N
    Zerbib, M
    Flam, T
    Debré, B
    Banu, A
    Scotté, F
    Andrieu, JMM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 854S - 854S
  • [3] Are prostate-specific antigen changes valid surrogates for survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer? A meta-analysis is needed!
    Collette, Laurence
    Buyse, Marc
    Burzykowski, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (35) : 5673 - 5674
  • [4] Are prostate-specific antigen changes valid surrogates for survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer? A meta-analysis is needed! - In reply
    Armstrong, Andrew J.
    Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth
    Eisenberger, Mario
    Tannock, Ian
    de Wit, Ronald
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (35) : 5674 - 5674
  • [5] Prednisone plus gefitinib versus prednisone plus placebo in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A randomized phase II trial
    Boccardo, Francesco
    Rubagotti, Alessandra
    Conti, Giario
    Battaglia, Michele
    Cruciani, Giorgio
    Manganelli, Antonio
    Ricci, Sergio
    Lapini, Alberto
    ONCOLOGY, 2008, 74 (3-4) : 223 - 228
  • [6] Palliation and Survival After Repeated 188Re-HEDP Therapy of Hormone-Refractory Bone Metastases of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
    Biersack, Hans-Juergen
    Palmedo, Holger
    Andris, Andrej
    Rogenhofer, Stefan
    Knapp, Furn F.
    Guhlke, Stefan
    Ezziddin, Samer
    Bucerius, Jan
    von Mallek, Dirk
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (11) : 1721 - 1726
  • [7] Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: A Canadian randomized trial with palliative end points
    Tannock, IF
    Osoba, D
    Stockler, MR
    Ernst, DS
    Neville, AJ
    Moore, MJ
    Armitage, GR
    Wilson, JJ
    Venner, PM
    Coppin, CML
    Murphy, KC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (06) : 1756 - 1764
  • [8] Palliation and Survival After Repeated 188Re-HEDP Therapy of Hormone-Refractory Bone Metastases of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
    Orsini, Federica
    Guidoccio, Federica
    Mazzarri, Sara
    Mariani, Giuliano
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (08) : 1330 - 1331
  • [9] Treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with docetaxel or mitoxantrone: Relationships between prostate-specific antigen, pain, and quality of life response and survival in the TAX-327 study
    Berthold, Dominik R.
    Pond, Gregory R.
    Roessner, Martin
    de Wit, Ronald
    Eisenberger, Mario
    Tannock, Ian F.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (09) : 2763 - 2767
  • [10] Suramin therapy for patients with symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: Results of a randomized phase III trial comparing suramin plus hydrocortisone to placebo plus hydrocortisone
    Small, EJ
    Meyer, M
    Marshall, ME
    Reyno, LM
    Meyers, FJ
    Natale, RB
    Lenehan, PF
    Chen, L
    Slichenmyer, WJ
    Eisenberger, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (07) : 1440 - 1450