Elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Muhammad, Juliawati [1 ]
Yusof, Yusnita [1 ]
Ahmad, Imran [1 ]
Norhayati, Mohd Noor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Med Sci, Dept Family Med, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
关键词
Elagolix; GnRH antagonist; Uterine fibroid; Leiomyoma; Heavy menstrual bleeding; Estradiol; norethindrone acetate; BLOOD-LOSS; EFFICACY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; SAFETY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-022-01596-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Elagolix is effective and safe for treating menorrhagia in women with uterine fibroid. However, it is reported to be associated with hypoestrogenism that can be alleviated by adding estradiol/norethindrone acetate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid by comparing: elagolix versus placebo and elagolix versus estradiol/norethindrone acetate. Methodology The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2021, Issue 3 of 12), MEDLINE databases (1980 to December week 1, 2020), and trial registries for relevant randomized clinical trials were used. All randomized clinical trials were reviewed and evaluated. Random effects models were used to estimate the dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Data for risk of bias, heterogeneity, sensitivity, reporting bias and quality of evidence were assessed. Results Four randomized controlled trials with 1949 premenopausal women from 323 locations were included. Elagolix improved menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml (RR 4.81, 95% CI 2.45 to 9.45; four trials, 869 participants; moderate quality evidence) or more than 50% reduction from baseline (RR 4.87, 95% CI 2.55 to 9.31; four trials, 869 participants; moderate quality evidence) compared to placebo. There was no difference in menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.16; five trials, 1365 participants; moderate quality evidence) or more than 50% reduction from baseline between the elagolix (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15; five trials, 1365 participants; high quality evidence) and elagolix with estradiol/norethindrone acetate. In both comparisons, elagolix has reduced the mean percentage change in uterine and fibroid volume, improved symptoms, and health-related quality of life. More patients had hot flush, and bone mineral density loss in the elagolix treatment compared to both placebo and elagolix with estradiol/norethindrone acetate. Conclusions Elagolix appeared to be effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding caused by uterine fibroid and combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate was able to alleviate the hypoestrogenism side effects in premenopausal women. Review registration PROSPERO CDR 42021233898.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Juliawati Muhammad
    Yusnita Yusof
    Imran Ahmad
    Mohd Noor Norhayati
    [J]. BMC Women's Health, 22
  • [2] Elagolix for Fibroid-Associated Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
    Schiffman, Marc
    Lamparello, Nicole A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (21): : 2066 - 2066
  • [3] Elagolix in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women
    Ali, Mohamed
    Sara, A. R.
    Al Hendy, Ayman
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 14 (04) : 427 - 437
  • [4] Safety and efficacy of elagolix (with and without add-back therapy) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ali, Mustafa
    Hira, Aruna Kumari
    Jawaid, Haris
    Zakaria, Faiza
    Somjee, Zehra
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2021, 26 (01)
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of elagolix (with and without add-back therapy) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mustafa Ali
    Aruna Kumari Hira
    Haris Jawaid
    Faiza Zakaria
    Zehra Somjee
    [J]. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 26
  • [6] Elagolix for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women with Uterine Fibroids
    Schlaff, William D.
    Ackerman, Ronald T.
    Al-Hendy, Ayman
    Archer, David F.
    Barnhart, Kurt T.
    Bradley, Linda D.
    Carr, Bruce R.
    Feinberg, Eve C.
    Hurtado, Sandra M.
    Kim, JinHee
    Liu, Ran
    Mabey, R. Garn, Jr.
    Owens, Charlotte D.
    Poindexter, Alfred
    Puscheck, Elizabeth E.
    Rodriguez-Ginorio, Henry
    Simon, James A.
    Soliman, Ahmed M.
    Stewart, Elizabeth A.
    Watts, Nelson B.
    Muneyyirci-Delale, Ozgul
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (04): : 328 - 340
  • [7] Elagolix Treatment for Up to 12 Months in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas
    Simon, James A.
    Al-Hendy, Ayman
    Archer, David F.
    Barnhart, Kurt T.
    Bradley, Linda D.
    Carr, Bruce R.
    Dayspring, Thomas
    Feinberg, Eve C.
    Gillispie, Veronica
    Hurtado, Sandra
    Kim, JinHee
    Liu, Ran
    Owens, Charlotte D.
    Muneyyirci-Delale, Ozgul
    Wang, Alice
    Watts, Nelson B.
    Schlaff, William D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (06): : 1313 - 1326
  • [9] Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Bergeron, Catherine
    Laberge, Philippe Y.
    Boutin, Amelie
    Theriault, Marie-Anne
    Valcourt, Florence
    Lemyre, Madeleine
    Maheux-Lacroix, Sarah
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2020, 26 (02) : 302 - 311
  • [10] Endometrial Evaluation in Elagolix-Treated Women With Uterine Fibroids and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
    Carr, Bruce R.
    Bradley, Linda D.
    Owens, Charlotte D.
    Gao, Jinging
    Chwalisz, Kristof
    Simon, James A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 82S - 83S