Acute pyelonephritis among adults - Cost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of therapy

被引:91
|
作者
Brown, P
Ki, M
Foxman, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Eulju Univ, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Taejon, South Korea
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200523110-00005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is an infection anywhere in the urinary tract, most commonly due to bacteria. If infection involves the kidney, the UTI is termed acute pyelonephritis (APN). An estimated 10-30% of all patients with APN are hospitalised for treatment; in the US, the incidence of hospitalisation is 11.7 per 10 000 for women and 2.4 per 10000 for men. Perhaps because of the generally good prognosis of APN when treated with current antibacterial therapies, there have been relatively few studies of patient management and therapeutic options for the disease, or of its epidemiology and risk factors. The most cost-effective Outpatient management strategy (immediate discharge, observation followed by discharge, etc.) is currently unknown. Appropriate antimicrobial selection is clearly important, as treatment failures will increase the cost of care and result in additional morbidity for patients. The direct and indirect costs of APN are significant: an estimated $US2.14 billion (year 2000 values). Cost estimates are most sensitive to hospitalisation rates, which are unknown in the US. Additional studies are needed to better define when in-hospital treatment is required. As the pathogens causing APN are increasingly becoming resistant to current therapies, not only are clinical trials in order to test the effectiveness of alternative therapies, but epidemiological studies to identify risk factors for infection with a resistant isolate and effective prevention strategies are required, especially among those with previous episodes of APN.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1142
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acute pyelonephritis among adultsCost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of therapy
    Patricia Brown
    Moran Ki
    Betsy Foxman
    PharmacoEconomics, 2005, 23 : 1123 - 1142
  • [2] Cystic fibrosis - Cost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of potential therapies
    Krauth, C
    Jalilvand, N
    Welte, T
    Busse, R
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2003, 21 (14) : 1001 - 1024
  • [3] Influenza - Cost of illness and considerations in the economic evaluation of new and emerging therapies
    Cram, P
    Blitz, SG
    Monto, A
    Fendrick, AM
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [4] Enteroviral meningitis - Cost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of potential therapies
    Parasuraman, TV
    Frenia, K
    Romero, J
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [5] Hepatitis C - Cost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of antiviral therapies
    Wong, John B.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (07) : 661 - 672
  • [6] Cost of Illness and Economic Evaluation in Rare Diseases
    Lopez-Bastida, Julio
    Oliva-Moreno, Juan
    RARE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 686 : 273 - 282
  • [7] A prospective evaluation of the management of acute pyelonephritis in adults referred to urologists
    Gujral, S
    Bell, CR
    Dare, L
    Smith, PJB
    Persad, RA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 57 (03) : 238 - 240
  • [8] Economic Evaluation of Pediatric Tracheostomy: A Cost of Illness Analysis
    Zhang, Jinghan
    Liu, Palmila
    Narayanan, Ajay M.
    Chorney, Stephen R.
    Kou, Yann-Fuu
    Johnson, Romaine F.
    OTO OPEN, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [9] Enteroviral MeningitisCost of Illness and Considerations for the Economic Evaluation of Potential Therapies
    T. V. Parasuraman
    Kathleen Frenia
    Jose Romero
    PharmacoEconomics, 2001, 19 : 3 - 12
  • [10] InfluenzaCost of Illness and Considerations in the Economic Evaluation of New and Emerging Therapies
    Peter Cram
    Susan G. Blitz
    Arnold Monto
    A. Mark Fendrick
    PharmacoEconomics, 2001, 19 : 223 - 230