Constraint identification techniques for lean manufacturing systems

被引:11
|
作者
Sims, Trumone [1 ,2 ]
Wan, Hung-da
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, Ctr Adv Mfg & Lean Syst, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
[2] 210 Acorn Tree Court, Spring, TX 77388 USA
关键词
Theory of Constraints; Constant Work-In-Process (CONWIP); Continuous moving conveyors; Assembly line;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcim.2015.12.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The first step in the Theory of Constraints (TOC) methodology is to identify the constraint. Several methods have been recommended in literature, such as looking for a backup of inventory (i.e., the operation that the inventory is waiting for is the constraint), or using linear programming or other analytical models. Yet, these methods may not be useful in a matured lean environment, which may have moving assembly lines where constraints are not obvious. This paper proposes three new methods for this purpose. The first method, Flow Constraint Analysis, takes a holistic view and evaluates whether the customer's demand is being satisfied. This evaluation is made by comparing the takt times and the cycle times of resources in the manufacturing system in order to identify the constraint(s). The second method, Effective Utilization Analysis, can be employed to pinpoint the location of the system constraint to a specific process or station. The actual production throughput is compared against the ideal capacity of the system to locate the bottleneck. This method is based on the relationship between WIP, bottleneck rate and lead time for a constant work in process (CONWIP) system. The third method, Quick Effective Utilization Analysis, can be used when there is little or no historical line performance data available. A case study of these methods applied to an actual production facility is presented. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 58
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lean manufacturing: Techniques, people and culture
    Lathin, D
    Mitchell, R
    [J]. ASQ'S 55TH ANNUAL QUALITY CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 321 - 325
  • [2] A Review on Lean Manufacturing Implementation Techniques
    Sundar, R.
    Balaji, A. N.
    SatheeshKumar, R. M.
    [J]. 12TH GLOBAL CONGRESS ON MANUFACTURING AND MANAGEMENT (GCMM - 2014), 2014, 97 : 1875 - 1885
  • [3] Constraint management in manufacturing systems
    Roser, C
    Nakano, M
    Tanaka, M
    [J]. JSME INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL SERIES C-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS MACHINE ELEMENTS AND MANUFACTURING, 2003, 46 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [4] Lean manufacturing techniques and its implementation: A review
    Kumar, Naveen
    Hasan, Syed Shahzeb
    Srivastava, Kunal
    Akhtar, Rayhan
    Yadav, Rakesh Kumar
    Choubey, Vikas Kumar
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 64 : 1188 - 1192
  • [5] APPLICATION OF LEAN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Dickson, Eric W.
    Singh, Sabi
    Cheung, Dickson S.
    Wyatt, Christopher C.
    Nugent, Andrew S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02): : 177 - 182
  • [6] The SoS approach for lean manufacturing systems
    Alfieri, Arianna
    Cantamessa, Marco
    Montagna, Francesca
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 57 (1-3) : 149 - 165
  • [7] The SoS approach for lean manufacturing systems
    [J]. Alfieri, A. (arianna.alfieri@polito.it), 1600, Inderscience Publishers (57): : 1 - 3
  • [8] RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF LEAN MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
    Mocan, Bogdan
    Fulea, Mircea
    Brad, Stelian
    [J]. QUALITY AND INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, : 127 - 130
  • [9] Improvement of lean manufacturing approach based on MCDM techniques for sustainable manufacturing
    Aouag, Hichem
    Soltani, Mohyiddine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01) : 50 - 74
  • [10] Lean Rules Identification and Classification for Manufacturing Industry
    Mourtzis, D.
    Papathanasiou, P.
    Fotia, S.
    [J]. 26TH CIRP DESIGN CONFERENCE, 2016, 50 : 198 - 203