Practitioners' perspectives on health in Strategic Environmental Assessment of spatial planning policies in Scotland

被引:1
|
作者
Logue, C. [1 ]
Werner, C. [1 ]
Douglas, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst, Old Med Sch, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Environmental assessment; Health impact assessment; Spatial planning;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Local authorities in Scotland are required to produce a Local Development Plan (LDP), which allocates sites for development and sets policies to guide decisions on planning applications. As part of this, local authorities must undertake a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). This is a structured assessment of likely environmental impacts, which includes human health. This study explores how SEA practitioners and SEA consultation authorities consider health. Study design: Qualitative study design using eight in-depth semi-structured interviews. Methods: Individual interviews were carried out with SEA practitioners from six local authority areas in Scotland and two SEA consultation authorities. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Results: Respondents articulated a broad perspective on health, but this was not reflected in SEA practice. Barriers to considering health more fully in SEA included low confidence in assessing health, limited partnership working with public health professionals and the lack of a consultation authority able to cover all aspects of health. Respondents valued partnership work between public health and planning professionals. Conclusion: This study suggests recent work in Scotland to increase understanding of the role of spatial planning to influence health has been successful. However, further work is required to expand this to include links between spatial planning and health inequalities. SEA in Scotland does not currently support holistic consideration of health and health inequalities. Strong partnership working between public health and other sectors can increase understanding of links with health and create healthy places. (c) 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 51
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating strategic environmental assessment into spatial planning in Egypt
    Hegazy, Ibrahim Rizk
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 15 : 131 - 144
  • [2] Addressing cumulative effects in Strategic Environmental Assessment of spatial planning
    Bragagnolo, Chiara
    Geneletti, Davide
    AESTIMUM, 2012, 60 : 39 - 52
  • [3] Strategic Environmental Assessment and spatial planning in Italy: sustainability, integration and democracy
    Rega, Carlo
    Bonifazi, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (09) : 1333 - 1358
  • [4] Health and Spatial Planning Policies
    Goncalves, Carlos
    Santinha, Goncalo
    Marques, Joao
    de Castro, Eduardo Anselmo
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2021, 26 : 2413 - 2413
  • [6] STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE SPATIAL PLANNING OF WATER ACCUMULATION BASINS
    Nikola, Krunic
    Bosko, Josimovic
    Sasa, Milijic
    Vladica, Ristic
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2017, 26 (02): : 1281 - 1290
  • [7] The spatial planning and development in the spirit of sustainability, strategic environmental assessment, geographical approach
    Salamin Geza
    TER ES TARSADALOM, 2016, 30 (02): : 147 - 152
  • [8] Integration of ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment across spatial planning scales
    Rozas-Vasquez, Daniel
    Fuerst, Christine
    Geneletti, Davide
    Almendra, Osvaldo
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 71 : 303 - 310
  • [9] Strategic Environmental Assessment as catalyst of healthier spatial planning: The Danish guidance and practice
    Kornov, Lone
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2009, 29 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [10] Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A practitioners' perspective
    Rega, Carlo
    Baldizzone, Giorgio
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 50 : 105 - 115