Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C)

被引:11
|
作者
Zhang, Yin-Ping [1 ]
Zhao, Xin-Shuang [1 ]
Zhang, Bei [1 ]
Zhang, Lu-Lu [1 ]
Ni, Chun-Ping [2 ]
Hao, Nan [3 ]
Shi, Chang-Bei [4 ]
Porr, Caroline [5 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Nursing, Hlth Sci Ctr, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[2] Mental Hlth Inst, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oncol, Attached Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[4] Shaanxi Prov Tumor Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[5] Mem Univ, Sch Nursing, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Caregiver; Cancer; Needs assessment; Culturally appropriate survey instruments; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; VALIDATION; BURDEN; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-014-0891-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C) is a systematic and comprehensive needs assessment tool for the family caregivers. The purpose of this project was twofold: (1) to adapt the CNAT-C to Mainland China's cultural context and (2) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese CNAT-C. Cross-cultural adaptation of the original CNAT-C was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 30 Chinese family cancer caregivers. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 205 Chinese cancer caregivers from Mainland China. Construct validity was determined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The split-half coefficient for the overall Chinese CNAT-C scale was 0.77. Principal component analysis resulted in an eight-factor structure explaining 68.11 % of the total variance. The comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.91 from the modified model confirmatory factor analysis. The Chi-square divided by degrees of freedom was 1.98, and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.079. In relation to the known-group validation, significant differences were found in the Chinese CNAT-C scale according to various caregiver characteristics. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese CNAT-C reaching a Cronbach alpha value of 0.94. Test-retest reliability was 0.85. The newly adapted Chinese CNAT-C scale possesses adequate validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be used to ascertain holistic health and support needs of cancer patients' family caregivers in Mainland China.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1614
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C)
    Yin-Ping Zhang
    Xin-Shuang Zhao
    Bei Zhang
    Lu-Lu Zhang
    Chun-Ping Ni
    Nan Hao
    Chang-Bei Shi
    Caroline Porr
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1607 - 1614
  • [2] Validation of the English and translated Chinese version of the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C)
    Yang, Grace Meijuan
    Pang, Grace Su-Yin
    Lee, Geok Ling
    Soek, Patricia
    Neo, Hui
    Wong, Yin Yee
    Qu, Debra Limin
    Cheung, Yin Bun
    PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 27 (03) : 103 - 108
  • [3] Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation
    Eun-Jung Shim
    kyung-Sook Lee
    Jong-Hyock Park
    Jae-Hyun Park
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011, 19 : 1957 - 1968
  • [4] Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation
    Shim, Eun-Jung
    Lee, Kyung-Sook
    Park, Jong-Hyock
    Park, Jae-Hyun
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2011, 19 (12) : 1957 - 1968
  • [5] Cross-cultural validation of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool: Chinese Version
    Xing Liu
    Ying Wu
    Min Yang
    Yang Li
    Jessica Hahne
    Kaveh Khoshnood
    Linda Coleman
    Xiaomin Wang
    BMC Medical Ethics, 22
  • [6] Cross-cultural validation of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool: Chinese Version
    Liu, Xing
    Wu, Ying
    Yang, Min
    Li, Yang
    Hahne, Jessica
    Khoshnood, Kaveh
    Coleman, Linda
    Wang, Xiaomin
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [7] Cross-cultural validation of the portuguese version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (PORTENAT)
    Cruz, A.
    Machado, P.
    Hill, J.
    Campos, M.
    Apostolo, J.
    Marques, A.
    Malcata, A.
    Ndosi, M.
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2015, 40 (03): : 242 - 253
  • [8] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the ankle joint functional assessment tool (AJFAT) questionnaire
    Li, Jinfeng
    Qiu, Fanji
    Legerlotz, Kirsten
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [9] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the ankle joint functional assessment tool (AJFAT) questionnaire
    Jinfeng Li
    Fanji Qiu
    Kirsten Legerlotz
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 16
  • [10] An online delirium detection tool: Cross-cultural adaptation of a Chinese version of the Family Confusion Assessment Method
    Xing, Huanmin
    Zhu, Shichao
    Liu, Shiqing
    Xia, Ming
    Tong, Shuaihong
    Li, Long
    Li, Liming
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 37 (05) : 740 - 746