How, in what contexts, and why do quality dashboards lead to improvements in care quality in acute hospitals? Protocol for a realist feasibility evaluation

被引:10
|
作者
Randell, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Alvarado, Natasha [2 ,3 ]
McVey, Lynn [2 ,3 ]
Greenhalgh, Joanne [4 ]
West, Robert M. [5 ]
Farrin, Amanda [6 ]
Gale, Chris [7 ]
Parslow, Roger [7 ]
Keen, Justin [5 ]
Elshehaly, Mai [8 ]
Ruddle, Roy A. [9 ]
Lake, Julia [10 ]
Mamas, Mamas [11 ]
Feltbower, Richard [7 ]
Dowding, Dawn [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Fac Hlth Studies, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Wolfson Ctr Appl Hlth Res, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Healthcare, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Sociol & Social Policy, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Clin Trials Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ Bradford, Fac Engn & Informat, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[9] Univ Leeds, Sch Comp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[10] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[11] Royal Stoke Univ Hosp, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[12] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
PATIENT SAFETY; AUDIT; FEEDBACK; MORTALITY; CLINICIAN; OUTCOMES; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033208
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction National audits are used to monitor care quality and safety and are anticipated to reduce unexplained variations in quality by stimulating quality improvement (QI). However, variation within and between providers in the extent of engagement with national audits means that the potential for national audit data to inform QI is not being realised. This study will undertake a feasibility evaluation of QualDash, a quality dashboard designed to support clinical teams and managers to explore data from two national audits, the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) and the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet). Methods and analysis Realist evaluation, which involves building, testing and refining theories of how an intervention works, provides an overall framework for this feasibility study. Realist hypotheses that describe how, in what contexts, and why QualDash is expected to provide benefit will be tested across five hospitals. A controlled interrupted time series analysis, using key MINAP and PICANet measures, will provide preliminary evidence of the impact of QualDash, while ethnographic observations and interviews over 12 months will provide initial insight into contexts and mechanisms that lead to those impacts. Feasibility outcomes include the extent to which MINAP and PICANet data are used, data completeness in the audits, and the extent to which participants perceive QualDash to be useful and express the intention to continue using it after the study period. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the University of Leeds School of Healthcare Research Ethics Committee. Study results will provide an initial understanding of how, in what contexts, and why quality dashboards lead to improvements in care quality. These will be disseminated to academic audiences, study participants, hospital IT departments and national audits. If the results show a trial is feasible, we will disseminate the QualDash software through a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Alternative payment models in Dutch hospital care: what works, how, why and under what circumstances? Protocol for a realist evaluation study
    Hendriks, Celine Maria Rosanne
    Vugts, Miel Antonius Petrus
    Eijkenaar, Frank
    Struijs, Jeroen Nathan
    Cattel, Danielle
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [2] What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals?
    Sofaer, S
    Crofton, C
    Goldstein, E
    Hoy, E
    Crabb, J
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (06) : 2018 - 2036
  • [3] Exploring why quality circles work in primary health care: a realist review protocol.
    Rohrbasser A.
    Mickan S.
    Harris J.
    Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) : 110
  • [4] What Is Quality Spiritual Care and How Do You Measure It?
    Handzo, George
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (05) : 886 - 886
  • [5] Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
    Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
    Ahaus, Kees
    Welker, Gera
    Gans, Rijk
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [6] Upskilling programmes for unregulated care providers to provide diabetic foot screening for systematically marginalised populations: how, why and in what contexts do they work? A realist review
    Hassan, Samah
    Rac, Valeria E.
    Hodges, Brian
    Leake, Patti
    Cobbing, Saul
    Gray, Catharine Marie
    Bartley, Nicola
    Etherington, Andrea
    Abdulwasi, Munira
    Cheung, Hei-Ching Kristy
    Anderson, Melanie
    Woods, Nicole N.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [7] How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation
    Devi, Reena
    Chadborn, Neil H.
    Meyer, Julienne
    Banerjee, Jay
    Goodman, Claire
    Dening, Tom
    Gladman, John R. F.
    Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
    Long, Annabelle
    Usman, Adeela
    Housley, Gemma
    Lewis, Sarah
    Glover, Matthew
    Gage, Heather
    Logan, Philippa A.
    Martin, Finbarr C.
    Gordon, Adam L.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50 (04) : 1371 - 1381
  • [8] Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
    Torres, Jacqueline Alves
    Leal, Maria do Carmo
    Soares Madeira Domingues, Rosa Maria
    Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
    Nakano, Andreza Rodrigues
    Gomes, Maysa Luduvice
    Figueiro, Ana Claudia
    Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
    Viellas de Oliveira, Elaine Fernandes
    da Silva Ayres, Barbara Vasques
    Sandall, Jane
    Belizan, Jose M.
    Hartz, Zulmira
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 15
  • [9] Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
    Jacqueline Alves Torres
    Maria do Carmo Leal
    Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues
    Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira
    Andreza Rodrigues Nakano
    Maysa Luduvice Gomes
    Ana Claudia Figueiró
    Marcos Nakamura-Pereira
    Elaine Fernandes Viellas de Oliveira
    Bárbara Vasques da Silva Ayres
    Jane Sandall
    José M Belizán
    Zulmira Hartz
    Reproductive Health, 15
  • [10] Quality improvement collaborative aiming for Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH): a realist evaluation protocol
    Devi, Reena
    Meyer, Julienne
    Banerjee, Jay
    Goodman, Claire
    Gladman, John Raymond Fletcher
    Dening, Tom
    Chadborn, Neil
    Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
    Long, Annabelle
    Usman, Adeela
    Housley, Gemma
    Bowman, Clive
    Martin, Finbarr
    Logan, Phillipa
    Lewis, Sarah
    Gordon, Adam Lee
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (11):