How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?

被引:104
|
作者
Zhu, Jiang [1 ,2 ]
He, Fuhong [1 ,2 ]
Song, Shuhui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Yu, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Genome Sci & Informat, Beijing Inst Genom, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Grad Univ, Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-9-172
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Housekeeping (HK) genes are ubiquitously expressed in all tissue/cell types and constitute a basal transcriptome for the maintenance of basic cellular functions. Partitioning transcriptomes into HK and tissue-specific (TS) genes relatively is fundamental for studying gene expression and cellular differentiation. Although many studies have aimed at large-scale and thorough categorization of human HK genes, a meaningful consensus has yet to be reached. Results: We collected two latest gene expression datasets (both EST and microarray data) from public databases and analyzed the gene expression profiles in 18 human tissues that have been well-documented by both two data types. Benchmarked by a manually-curated HK gene collection (HK408), we demonstrated that present data from EST sampling was far from saturated, and the inadequacy has limited the gene detectability and our understanding of TS expressions. Due to a likely over-stringent threshold, microarray data showed higher false negative rate compared with EST data, leading to a significant underestimation of HK genes. Based on EST data, we found that 40.0% of the currently annotated human genes were universally expressed in at least 16 of 18 tissues, as compared to only 5.1% specifically expressed in a single tissue. Our current EST-based estimate on human HK genes ranged from 3,140 to 6,909 in number, a ten-fold increase in comparison with previous microarray-based estimates. Conclusion: We concluded that a significant fraction of human genes, at least in the currently annotated data depositories, was broadly expressed. Our understanding of tissue-specific expression was still preliminary and required much more large-scale and high-quality transcriptomic data in future studies. The new HK gene list categorized in this study will be useful for genome-wide analyses on structural and functional features of HK genes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
    Jiang Zhu
    Fuhong He
    Shuhui Song
    Jing Wang
    Jun Yu
    [J]. BMC Genomics, 9
  • [2] HOW MANY ATOMS CAN BE DEFINED BY BOXES
    GYARFAS, A
    LEHEL, J
    TUZA, Z
    [J]. COMBINATORICA, 1985, 5 (03) : 193 - 204
  • [3] Human genes: How many?
    Hollon, T
    [J]. SCIENTIST, 2001, 15 (20): : 1 - +
  • [4] How useful are housekeeping genes?: Variable expression in melanoma metastases
    Kagedal, Bertil
    Farnebaeck, Malin
    Hakansson, Annika
    Gustafsson, Bertil
    Hakansson, Leif
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2007, 45 (11) : 1481 - 1487
  • [5] Preservation of Ranking Order in the Expression of Human Housekeeping Genes
    Shaw, Grace T. W.
    Shih, Edward S. C.
    Chen, Chun-Houh
    Hwang, Ming-Jing
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (12):
  • [6] HOW MANY HUMAN CANCER GENES
    NOWELL, PC
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (15) : 1061 - 1064
  • [7] How many genes in human genome?
    Roest Crollius, H
    Jaillon, O
    [J]. M S-MEDECINE SCIENCES, 2000, 16 (8-9): : 988 - 990
  • [8] HOW MANY GENES IN THE HUMAN GENOME
    FIELDS, C
    ADAMS, MD
    WHITE, O
    VENTER, JC
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 1994, 7 (03) : 345 - 346
  • [9] Investigating the variable expression of housekeeping genes in normal human keratinocytes
    Stoneley, Rosalie
    Andrews, Katy
    Eckl, Katja
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 633 - 633
  • [10] How many human genes? Still counting
    Maher, BA
    [J]. SCIENTIST, 2002, 16 (01): : 9 - 9