Using Deception Ethically Practical Research Guidelines for Researchers and Reviewers

被引:9
|
作者
Pascual-Leone, Antonio Z. [1 ]
Singh, Terence [1 ]
Scoboria, Alan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Dept Psychol, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
来源
关键词
ethics; deception; teaching instruments; review; DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS; PSYCHOLOGY; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1037/a0021119
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article reviews highlights in the literature on existing recommendations for ethical use of deception in psychological research We conclude that ethical guidelines and aspirational statements set out by research policies and advisory panels on ethics must eventually be operationalized into concrete terms when introducing deception into a research design Specific directives for using deception are especially important for new researchers developing projects and also for university/departmental reviewers who are being asked to evaluate the ethical standing of proposed research We offer a checklist designed to cultivate the understanding of junior researchers and to facilitate the review process by instantiating the relevant general guidelines into a set of Y/N questions about Intended research Finally, the article presents empirical data from researchers and ethics reviewers who provided end-user evaluations of the tool
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HOW TO REPORT ON QUALITATIVE RESEARCH? GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS, MENTORS AND REVIEWERS
    Ajdukovic, Marina
    LJETOPIS SOCIJALNOG RADA, 2014, 21 (03): : 345 - 366
  • [2] COPY TESTS IN FTC DECEPTION CASES - GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS
    MARONICK, TJ
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 1991, 31 (06) : 9 - 17
  • [3] A practical guide for researchers and reviewers using the ABCD Study and other large longitudinal datasets
    Saragosa-Harris, Natalie M.
    Chaku, Natasha
    MacSweeney, Niamh
    Williamson, Victoria Guazzelli
    Scheuplein, Maximilian
    Feola, Brandee
    Iniguez, Carlos
    Demir-Lira, Ece
    McNeilly, Elizabeth A.
    Huffman, Landry Goodgame
    Whitmore, Lucy
    Michalska, Kalina J.
    Damme, Katherine S. F.
    Rakesh, Divyangana
    Mills, Kathryn L.
    DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 55
  • [4] Experience in training researchers as authors and reviewers of research papers
    Asencio Cabot, Esperanza
    Ibarra Lopez, Nilda
    BIBLIOS-REVISTA DE BIBLIOTECOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION, 2018, (70): : 44 - 59
  • [5] Practical Guidelines for Qualitative Research Using Online Forums
    Im, Eun-Ok
    Chee, Faan Wonshik
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2012, 30 (11) : 604 - 611
  • [6] Quality Criteria: General and Specific Guidelines for Qualitative Approaches in Psychology Research. A Concise Guide for Novice Researchers and Reviewers
    Cena, Elida
    Brooks, Joanna
    Day, William
    Goodman, Simon
    Rousaki, Anastasia
    Ruby-Granger, Victoria
    Seymour-Smith, Sarah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2024, 23
  • [7] Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers
    Schifferdecker, Karen E.
    Reed, Virginia A.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (07) : 637 - 644
  • [8] Researchers using environmental DNA must engage ethically with Indigenous communities
    Handsley-Davis, Matilda
    Kowal, Emma
    Russell, Lynette
    Weyrich, Laura S.
    NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2021, 5 (02) : 146 - 148
  • [9] Researchers using environmental DNA must engage ethically with Indigenous communities
    Matilda Handsley-Davis
    Emma Kowal
    Lynette Russell
    Laura S. Weyrich
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2021, 5 : 146 - 148
  • [10] Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers
    Cronin, Paul
    Rawson, James V.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (05) : 537 - 558