Towards standardising market-independent indicators for quantifying energy flexibility in buildings

被引:35
|
作者
Kathirgamanathan, Anjukan [1 ,2 ]
Pean, Thibault [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Kun [5 ]
De Rosa, Mattia [1 ,2 ]
Salom, Jaume [3 ]
Kummert, Michael [5 ]
Finn, Donal P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Energy Inst, Dublin, Spain
[3] Catalonia Inst Energy Res IREC, Thermal Energy & Bldg Performance Grp, Jard Ns Dones Negre 1, Barcelona 08930, Spain
[4] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Automat Control Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Polytech Montreal, Dept Mech Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Smart grid; Buildings; Energy flexibility; Demand side management; Demand response; Thermal energy storage; STRUCTURAL THERMAL STORAGE; DEMAND FLEXIBILITY; HEAT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings are increasingly being seen as a potential source of energy flexibility to the smart grid as a form of demand side management. Indicators are required to quantify the energy flexibility available from buildings, enabling a basis for a contractual framework between the relevant stakeholders such as end users, aggregators and grid operators. In the literature, there is a lack of consensus and standardisation in terms of approaches and indicators for quantifying energy flexibility. In the present paper, current approaches are reviewed and the most recent and relevant market independent indicators are compared through analysis of four different case studies comprising varying building types, climates and control schemes to assess their robustness and applicability. Of the indicators compared, certain indicators are found to be more suitable for use by the end user when considering energy and carbon dioxide emission reductions. Other indicators are more useful for the grid operator. The recommended indicators are found to be robust to different demand response contexts, such as type of energy flexibility, control scheme, climate and building types. They capture the provided flexibility quantity, its shifting efficiency and rebound effect. A final cost index is also recommended given specific market conditions to capture the cost of a building providing energy flexibility. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] A semantic ontology for representing and quantifying energy flexibility of buildings
    Li, Han
    Hong, Tianzhen
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 8
  • [2] Towards the development of new energy performance indicators for the external walls of residential buildings
    Bellamy, Larry
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 68 : 696 - 702
  • [3] Transitioning positive energy buildings towards positive energy Communities: Leveraging performance indicators for site planning assessments
    Cai, Senhong
    Gou, Zhonghua
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 325
  • [4] Towards the definition of indicators for assessment of indoor air quality and energy performance in low-energy residential buildings
    Salis, Louis Cony Renaud
    Abadie, Marc
    Wargocki, Pawel
    Rode, Carsten
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 152 : 492 - 502
  • [5] Techno-Economic Analysis of the Energy Resilience Performance of Energy-Efficient Buildings in a Cold Climate and Participation in the Flexibility Market
    Saini, Ashish
    Hasan, Ala
    Shemeikka, Jari
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (12)
  • [6] Towards the integration of monitoring systems to support the evaluation of nearly Zero Energy Buildings through Key Performance Indicators
    Sanz, Roberto
    Corredera, Alvaro
    Hernandez, Jose L.
    Samiengo, Jesus
    Ma Vicente, Julia
    Bujedo, Luis A.
    2015 IEEE WORKSHOP ON ENVIRONMENTAL, ENERGY AND STRUCTURAL MONITORING SYSTEMS (EESMS), 2015, : 90 - 95
  • [7] Towards designing an aggregator to activate the energy flexibility of multi-zone buildings using a hierarchical model-based scheme
    Khatibi, Mahmood
    Rahnama, Samira
    Vogler-Finck, Pierre
    Bendtsen, Jan Dimon
    Afshari, Alireza
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 333