RANKING BEEF MUSCLES FOR WARNER-BRATZLER SHEAR FORCE AND TRAINED SENSORY PANEL RATINGS FROM PUBLISHED LITERATURE

被引:61
|
作者
Sullivan, G. A. [1 ]
Calkins, C. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Anim Sci, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
3 BOVINE MUSCLES; USDA QUALITY GRADE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; MAJOR MUSCLES; TENDERNESS SURVEY; SARCOMERE LENGTH; CHUCK MUSCLES; PALATABILITY TRAITS; INDIVIDUAL MUSCLES; CARCASS POSITION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-4557.2011.00386.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Meat scientists have long studied palatability traits of beef muscles, but few characterized numerous muscles over significant numbers of animals. The objective of this project was to rank the major beef muscles for Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) and sensory traits based on a comprehensive study of the literature, thereby compiling a large number of observations for each muscle. Muscles with three or more literature sources were ranked for WBS (n = 40), sensory tenderness (n = 14), juiciness (n = 13) and beef flavor (n = 9). Psoas major and infraspinatus were the top ranked for mechanical and sensory tenderness. Semitendinosus, gluteus medius, supraspinatus and pectoralis profundus were major muscles that were among the least tender. The Pearson correlation coefficient of WBS and sensory tenderness means was -0.84 (P = 0.001). These rankings may be useful as a reference for relative palatability of muscles. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Knowledge of the relative palatability and rank of individual muscle can serve as a resource at the retail and foodservice establishment to better meet consumers' needs, and through use in educational materials. The popularity and demand of the flat iron (infraspinatus) and petite tender (teres major) steaks are examples of better utilizing and merchandizing the carcass. Furthermore, it can aid processors and product development specialists in identifying additional muscles suitable for value-added processing and possibilities for acceptable muscle substitutions. Utilization by academics will be through reference for research needs and classroom instruction. The results of this ranking can be utilized by all sectors of the meat industry to ultimately provide an improved product for the consumer.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ranking beef muscles for Warner-Bratzler shear force and trained sensory panel ratings.
    Sullivan, G.
    Gwartney, B.
    Calkins, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 91 - 91
  • [2] Beef customer satisfaction: Trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values
    Lorenzen, CL
    Miller, RK
    Taylor, JF
    Neely, TR
    Tatum, JD
    Wise, JW
    Buyck, MJ
    Reagan, JO
    Savell, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 81 (01) : 143 - 149
  • [3] Cooking method effect on Warner-Bratzler shear force of different beef muscles
    Fabre, Romina
    Dalzotto, Gabriela
    Perlo, Flavia
    Bonato, Patricia
    Teira, Gustavo
    Tisocco, Osvaldo
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 138 : 10 - 14
  • [4] Constraints on establishing threshold levels for Warner-Bratzler shear-force values based on consumer sensory ratings for seven beef muscles
    Powell, L.
    Nicholson, K. L.
    Huerta-Montauti, D.
    Miller, R. K.
    Savell, J. W.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2011, 51 (10) : 959 - 966
  • [5] National beef tenderness survey - 2006: Assessment of Warner-Bratzler shear and sensory panel ratings for beef from US retail and foodservice establishments
    Voges, K. L.
    Mason, C. L.
    Brooks, J. C.
    Delmore, R. J.
    Griffin, D. B.
    Hale, D. S.
    Henning, W. R.
    Johnson, D. D.
    Lorenzen, C. L.
    Maddock, R. J.
    Miller, R. K.
    Morgan, J. B.
    Baird, B. E.
    Gwartney, B. L.
    Savell, J. W.
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2007, 77 (03) : 357 - 364
  • [6] National Beef Tenderness Survey-2010: Warner-Bratzler shear force values and sensory panel ratings for beef steaks from United States retail and food service establishments
    Guelker, M. R.
    Haneklaus, A. N.
    Brooks, J. C.
    Carr, C. C.
    Delmore, R. J., Jr.
    Griffin, D. B.
    Hale, D. S.
    Harris, K. B.
    Mafi, G. G.
    Johnson, D. D.
    Lorenzen, C. L.
    Maddock, R. J.
    Martin, J. N.
    Miller, R. K.
    Raines, C. R.
    VanOverbeke, D. L.
    Vedral, L. L.
    Wasser, B. E.
    Savell, J. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (02) : 1005 - 1014
  • [7] Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes
    Stelzleni, A. M.
    Patten, L. E.
    Johnson, D. D.
    Calkins, C. R.
    Gwartney, B. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 (10) : 2631 - 2638
  • [8] Relationship of texture profile analysis and Warner-Bratzler shear force with sensory characteristics of beef rib steaks
    Caine, WR
    Aalhus, JL
    Best, DR
    Dugan, MER
    Jeremiah, LE
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2003, 64 (04) : 333 - 339
  • [9] Relationship between beef consumer tenderness perception and Warner-Bratzler shear force
    Destefanis, G.
    Brugiapaglia, A.
    Barge, M. T.
    Dal Molin, E.
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2008, 78 (03) : 153 - 156
  • [10] Sampling, cooking, and goring effects on Warner-Bratzler shear force values in beef
    Wheeler, TL
    Shackelford, SD
    Koohmaraie, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 74 (07) : 1553 - 1562