Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study

被引:1
|
作者
Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar [1 ]
Fultambkar, Gajanan [1 ]
Rao, V. Rajeswar [1 ]
Kukreja, Vinay [1 ]
Gurram, Rammohan [1 ]
Nair, Abhijit [2 ]
机构
[1] Yashoda Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Secunderabad, India
[2] Ibra Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Ibra, Oman
来源
DUBAI MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2021年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
Acute pain; Brachial plexus; Regional anesthesia; Supraclavicular block; Ultrasonography; CORNER POCKET; ONSET;
D O I
10.1159/000517357
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. Results: The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (p = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (p < 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. Conclusion: The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of a Single- or Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Controlled Study
    Roy, Melanie
    Nadeau, Marie-Josee
    Cote, Dany
    Levesque, Simon
    Dion, Nicolas
    Nicole, Pierre C.
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2012, 37 (01) : 55 - 59
  • [2] A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Single- and Double-Injection, Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
    Tran, De Q. H.
    Munoz, Loreto
    Zaouter, Cedrick
    Russo, Gianluca
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (05) : 420 - 424
  • [3] A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Single- and Double-Injection Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
    Tran, De Q. H.
    Bertini, Pietro
    Zaouter, Cedrick
    Munoz, Loreto
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [4] A Randomized Comparison Between Double-Injection and Targeted Intracluster-Injection Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
    Techasuk, Wallaya
    Gonzalez, Andrea P.
    Bernucci, Francisca
    Cupido, Tracy
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    De Qh Tran
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 (06): : 1363 - 1369
  • [5] Comparison of single-injection ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block to double-injection ultrasound-guided axillary block: a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study
    Boivin, A.
    Nadeau, M. -J.
    Levesque, S.
    Dion, N.
    Nicole, P. -C.
    Turgeon, A. -F.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2013, 32 : A100 - A101
  • [6] Ultrasound-Guided Single-Injection Infraclavicular Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Double-Injection Axillary Block: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
    Boivin, Ariane
    Nadeau, Marie-Josee
    Dion, Nicolas
    Levesque, Simon
    Nicole, Pierre C.
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (01): : 273 - 278
  • [7] Single-point versus double-point injection technique of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: A randomized controlled study
    Choudhary, Nitin
    Kumar, Abhijit
    Kohli, Amit
    Wadhawan, Sonia
    Siddiqui, Tabish H.
    Bhadoria, Poonam
    Kamat, Hemlata
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 35 (03) : 373 - 378
  • [8] Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus block using a modified double-injection technique: a randomized non-inferiority trial
    Luo, Quehua
    Yao, Weifeng
    Chai, Yunfei
    Chang, Lu
    Yao, Hui
    Liang, Jiani
    Hao, Ning
    Guo, Song
    Shu, HaiHua
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2020, 40
  • [9] Single- versus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison
    Layera, Sebastian
    Aliste, Julian
    Bravo, Daniela
    Fernandez, Diego
    Garcia, Armando
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    Tran, De Q.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (03) : 209 - 213
  • [10] A Comparison of a Single or Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
    Desgagnes, Marie-Christine
    Levesque, Simon
    Dion, Nicolas
    Nadeau, Marie-Josee
    Cote, Dany
    Brassard, Jean
    Nicole, Pierre C.
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 109 (02): : 668 - 672