Mitigating Bias in Search Results Through Contextual Document Reranking and Neutrality Regularization

Societal biases can influence Information Retrieval system results, and conversely, search results can potentially reinforce existing societal biases. Recent research has therefore focused on developing methods for quantifying and mitigating bias in search results and applied them to contemporary retrieval systems that leverage transformer-based language models. In the present work, we expand this direction of research by considering bias mitigation within a framework for contextual document embedding reranking. In this framework, the transformer-based query encoder is optimized for relevance ranking through a list-wise objective, by jointly scoring for the same query a large set of candidate document embeddings in the context of one another, instead of in isolation. At the same time, we impose a regularization loss which penalizes highly scoring documents that deviate from neutrality with respect to a protected attribute (e.g., gender). Our approach for bias mitigation is end-to-end differentiable and efficient. Compared to the existing alternatives for deep neural retrieval architectures, which are based on adversarial training, we demonstrate that it can attain much stronger bias mitigation/fairness. At the same time, for the same amount of bias mitigation, it offers significantly better relevance performance (utility). Crucially, our method allows for a more finely controllable and predictable intensity of bias mitigation, which is essential for practical deployment in production systems.(1)