Peer-reviewed publication following presentation at a regional surgical meeting

被引:15
|
作者
Bowrey, DJ [1 ]
Morris-Stiff, GJ [1 ]
Clark, GWB [1 ]
Carey, PD [1 ]
Mansel, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, Cardiff CF4 4XN, S Glam, Wales
关键词
continuing medical education; peer review; publishing; medical societies; surgical education; Wales;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00273.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate the proportion of publications arising from work presented at a regional surgical meeting. Design A list of all presentations to the Welsh Surgical Society 1983-95 was compiled and a detailed search made of the Medline Database. The surgical topic of each presentation, the date of presentation, the date of publication and the journal of publication were recorded. Setting University Hospital of Wales. Results Four hundred and ninety-six papers were presented to the society, of which 402 (81%) were by trainees. The most frequent topics of presentation were colorectal (15%), vascular (15%) and hepato-pancreatico-biliary (11%). Two hundred and thirty-three papers (47%) have been published in peer-reviewed journals. The most popular journals for publication were Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England (19%), British Journal of Surgery (16%) and Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (8%). The median time from presentation to publication was 17.0 months (interquartile range 10.0-27.5 months). Conclusions Regional surgical meetings have an important role in the annual surgical calendar and they are the ideal initial setting for presentation by trainees.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 214
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BENEFITS OF PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION
    KLEIN, CN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1991, 48 (07): : 1424 - &
  • [2] The art of rapid peer-reviewed publication
    Hildebrandt, Stefan
    [J]. PHYSICA STATUS SOLIDI-RAPID RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 3 (01): : A3 - A4
  • [3] Conversion of Thesis to Peer-Reviewed Publication
    Shukla, Dhaval
    Tripathi, Manjul
    Devi, Bhagavatula Indira
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 8 (02) : 93 - 98
  • [4] The art of rapid peer-reviewed publication
    Hildebrandt, Stefan
    [J]. PHYSICA STATUS SOLIDI-RAPID RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 2 (06): : A77 - A78
  • [5] Institutional Review Boards and Peer-Reviewed Publication
    Hamilton, D. Kirk
    Stichler, Jaynelle F.
    [J]. HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2015, 8 (02) : 81 - 84
  • [6] Peer-reviewed publication: A view from inside
    Fisher, RS
    Powers, LE
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2004, 45 (08) : 889 - 894
  • [7] Publication of Long Conference Abstracts Jeopardizes Peer-Reviewed Publication
    Johnson, Kenneth A.
    [J]. VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 34 (04) : 302 - 302
  • [8] Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Quarto, Giuseppe
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    De Sio, Marco
    Damiano, Rocco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (03) : 833 - 840
  • [9] Journey from conference presentation to peer-reviewed publication: Do ends really meet?
    Ghosh, Sanjib Kumar
    Kadlimatt, H. S.
    Pujari, Dinanath
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ANATOMICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2018, 67 (02) : 193 - 198
  • [10] Peer-reviewed presentation exchange in an undergraduate classroom
    Kiselyov, Kirill
    Schunn, Christian D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2024, 25 (01)