The evolution of the type VI secretion system as a disintegration weapon

被引:2
|
作者
Smith, William P. J. [1 ,2 ]
Vettiger, Andrea [3 ]
Winter, Julius [3 ,4 ]
Ryser, Till [3 ]
Comstock, Laurie E. [5 ]
Basler, Marek [3 ]
Foster, Kevin R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Biochem, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Basel, Biozentrum, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
英国惠康基金; 欧洲研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BACTERIAL EFFECTOR PROTEINS; TOXIN DELIVERY-SYSTEMS; CELL-LYSIS; COMPETITION; WIDESPREAD; DIVERSITY; PLATFORM; ECOLOGY; WALL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000720; 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000720.r001; 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000720.r002; 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000720.r003; 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000720.r004; 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000720.r005; 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000720.r006
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a nanomachine used by many bacteria to drive a toxin-laden needle into other bacterial cells. Although the potential to influence bacterial competition is clear, the fitness impacts of wielding a T6SS are not well understood. Here we present a new agent-based model that enables detailed study of the evolutionary costs and benefits of T6SS weaponry during competition with other bacteria. Our model identifies a key problem with the T6SS. Because of its short range, T6SS activity becomes self-limiting, as dead cells accumulate in its way, forming "corpse barriers" that block further attacks. However, further exploration with the model presented a solution to this problem: if injected toxins can quickly lyse target cells in addition to killing them, the T6SS becomes a more effective weapon. We tested this prediction with single-cell analysis of combat between T6SS-wielding Acinetobacter baylyi and T6SS-sensitive Escherichia coli. As predicted, delivery of lytic toxins is highly effective, whereas nonlytic toxins leave large patches of E. coli alive. We then analyzed hundreds of bacterial species using published genomic data, which suggest that the great majority of T6SS-wielding species do indeed use lytic toxins, indicative of a general principle underlying weapon evolution. Our work suggests that, in the T6SS, bacteria have evolved a disintegration weapon whose effectiveness often rests upon the ability to break up competitors. Understanding the evolutionary function of bacterial weapons can help in the design of probiotics that can both establish well and eliminate problem species.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon
    Coulthurst, Sarah
    MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2019, 165 (05): : 503 - 515
  • [2] The ecological impact of a bacterial weapon: microbial interactions and the Type VI secretion system
    Gallegos-Monterrosa, Ramses
    Coulthurst, Sarah J.
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2021, 45 (06)
  • [3] Type VI secretion system
    Salomon, Dor
    Orth, Kim
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) : R265 - R266
  • [4] The Type VI Secretion System
    Kong Tian-Xiang
    Zhao Yi-Xin
    Du Jing
    Li Ying-Jie
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2020, 47 (12) : 1273 - 1284
  • [5] Phylogenetic Distribution and Evolution of Type VI Secretion System in the Genus Xanthomonas
    Liyanapathiranage, Prabha
    Wagner, Naama
    Avram, Oren
    Pupko, Tal
    Potnis, Neha
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [6] Type VI secretion system baseplate
    Alan R. Davidson
    Karen L. Maxwell
    Nature Microbiology, 2018, 3 : 1330 - 1331
  • [7] Tagging the type VI secretion system
    Francetic, Olivera
    NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 3 (11): : 1190 - 1191
  • [8] Type VI secretion system baseplate
    Davidson, Alan R.
    Maxwell, Karen L.
    NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 3 (12): : 1330 - 1331
  • [9] The Versatile Type VI Secretion System
    Alteri, Christopher J.
    Mobley, Harry L. T.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2016, 4 (02):
  • [10] Tagging the type VI secretion system
    Olivera Francetic
    Nature Microbiology, 2018, 3 : 1190 - 1191