Evaluating Oregon's occupational public health surveillance system based on the CDC updated guidelines

被引:9
|
作者
Yang, Liu [1 ]
Weston, Crystal [2 ]
Cude, Curtis [2 ]
Kincl, Laurel [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Human Sci, Sch Biol & Populat Hlth Sci, 103 Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Author, Publ Hlth Div, Portland, OR USA
关键词
occupational health indicators; occupational safety and health surveillance; surveillance evaluation; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; WORKERS-COMPENSATION; INJURY SURVEILLANCE; FILE;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.23139
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The Oregon Occupational Public Health Program (OOPHP) monitors occupational health indicators (OHIs) to inform occupational safety and health (OSH) surveillance. In 2018, OOPHP evaluated the performance of the OSH surveillance system and identified areas for future improvement. Methods Following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems, the OOPHP evaluation team engaged internal and external stakeholders using a mixed-methods approach. Operational measures for ten surveillance attributes were developed. Multiple data collection methods resulted in credible evidence for evaluation conclusions. Analyses included summary statistics and qualitative analysis of interviews, a focus group, and online surveys. Results Twenty stakeholders took part in this evaluation, with an average participation rate of 55%. Results showed the Oregon OSH surveillance system was simple, flexible, and highly accepted by its stakeholders. Funding security presents challenges for stability. A lack of timeliness of OHIs, low relevance of OHIs to local OSH issues, and the system's ineffectual data dissemination all limit the usefulness of the OSH surveillance system. A review of key data sources for the system showed good data quality and predictive value positive, but relatively poor sensitivity and representativeness. Conclusions The evaluation team successfully adapted attributes and examples in the CDC guidelines to this Oregon OSH surveillance evaluation. The evaluation findings have informed the development of recommendations for improvements to OOPHP's OSH surveillance. Future research is needed to develop guidance specific to OSH surveillance evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 725
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acute rheumatic fever surveillance in South Africa: An evaluation tool based on the CDC guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems
    Nkgudi, B.
    Engel, M. E.
    Mayosi, B. M.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 97 (11): : 1102 - 1102
  • [2] CDC's Public Health Surveillance of Cancer
    Ryerson, A. Blythe
    Massetti, Greta M.
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2017, 14
  • [3] CDC's Environmental Public Health Tracking Network: An Innovative Dynamic Surveillance System for You
    Balluz, Lina S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 76 (07) : 48 - 50
  • [4] Publication of updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems (Reprinted from MMWR, vol 50. pg 646, 2001)
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (12): : 1446 - 1446
  • [5] Ethics of public health surveillance: new guidelines
    Fairchild, Amy L.
    Haghdoost, Ali Akbar
    Bayer, Ronald
    Selgelid, Michael J.
    Dawson, Angus
    Saxena, Abha
    Reis, Andreas
    LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 2 (08): : E348 - E349
  • [6] An evidence-based system for health surveillance of occupational divers
    Sames, C.
    Gorman, D.
    Mitchell, S.
    Sandiford, P.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2016, 46 (10) : 1146 - 1152
  • [7] WHO guidelines on ethical public health surveillance
    Collier, Roger
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (29) : E977 - E977
  • [8] Competency Guidelines for Public Health Laboratory Professionals CDC and the Association of Public Health Laboratories
    Ned-Sykes, Renee
    Johnson, Catherine
    Ridderhof, John C.
    Perlman, Eva
    Pollock, Anne
    DeBoy, John M.
    MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2015, 64 (01): : 1 - 95
  • [9] AN EQUITY-BASED SCORING SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING SURVEILLANCE-RELATED HARM IN PUBLIC HEALTH CRISES
    Amani, Bita
    McAndrew, Breann
    Sharif, Mienah Z.
    Garcia, Jamie
    Nwankwo, Ezinne
    Cabral, Alejandra
    Abotsi-Kowu, Consuela
    Khan, Hamid
    Le, Cindy
    Ponder, Monica L.
    Ford, Chandra L.
    ETHNICITY & DISEASE, 2023, 33 (01) : 63 - 75
  • [10] TREATMENT OF CHLAMYDIA AND GONORRHEA IN A CHICAGO HEALTH SYSTEM: OBSERVATIONS OF TREATMENT PRACTICES BEFORE AND AFTER UPDATED CDC GUIDELINES
    Hardy, Tatia
    Bernstein, Karen
    Schwartz, Alan
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2023, 72 (03) : S87 - S87