Neonatal sepsis biomarkers: where are we now?

被引:18
|
作者
Gilfillan, Margaret [1 ]
Bhandari, Vineet [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, St Christophers Hosp Children, Dept Pediat, Sect Neonatal Perinatal Med,Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
关键词
infection; newborn; preterm infant; procalcitonin; neutrophil CD64; LATE-ONSET SEPSIS; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; SENSITIVE DIAGNOSTIC MARKER; GUIDED DECISION-MAKING; SERUM-AMYLOID-A; TIME PCR ASSAY; NEUTROPHIL CD64; ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY; REFERENCE INTERVALS;
D O I
10.2147/RRN.S163082
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Given that neonatal sepsis remains an important factor contributing to mortality and morbidity in neonates, identification of accurate biomarkers to aid in its timely and accurate diagnosis is critical. In this review, we discuss the current evidence behind the use of biomarkers commonly used in clinical practice, as well as presenting recent developments in this area of research. Besides summarizing information regarding "traditional" biomarkers (eg, hematological indices, CRP, and other acute-phase reactants, cytokines), we provide the latest clinical status on some relatively "newer" biomarkers (eg, PCR- and "-omic" technology-based, biophysical biomarkers) in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. We believe that certain biophysical (RALIS, core-peripheral temperature differences) in combination with selective biochemical (procalcitonin, nCD64, presepsin) markers offer the best likelihood of being adopted for clinical use in the detection of neonatal sepsis in the near future. In addition, serial measurements of selective biochemical markers (procalcitonin, nCD64) offer promise in the decision to initiate and/or control the duration of antibiotic therapy. It is important to conduct adequately powered prospective multicenter studies to continue to establish the accuracy and safety of utilizing such biomarkers of neonatal sepsis so that appropriate and adequate therapy is tailored to each infant for optimal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 20
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomarkers of Neonatal Sepsis: Where We Are and Where We Are Going
    Boscarino, Giovanni
    Migliorino, Rossana
    Carbone, Giulia
    Davino, Giusy
    Dell'Orto, Valentina Giovanna
    Perrone, Serafina
    Principi, Nicola
    Esposito, Susanna
    [J]. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (08):
  • [2] Sepsis in urology - where are we now? And where are we going?
    Duggan, William
    Moran, Diarmaid
    Challacombe, Ben
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 54 (05) : 438 - 442
  • [3] Biomarkers in melanoma: where are we now?
    Johnson, Douglas B.
    Sullivan, Ryan J.
    [J]. MELANOMA MANAGEMENT, 2014, 1 (02) : 139 - 150
  • [4] Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers: Where Are We Now?
    Gonzalez-Pons, Maria
    Cruz-Correa, Marcia
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [5] Editorial: Neonatal ECMO in 2019: Where Are We Now? Where Next?
    Cavallaro, Giacomo
    Di Nardo, Matteo
    Hoskote, Aparna
    Tibboel, Dick
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 9
  • [6] Maternal and neonatal pneumococcal vaccination - where are we now?
    Clarke, Ed
    Kampmann, Beate
    Goldblatt, David
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2016, 15 (10) : 1305 - 1317
  • [7] Maternal and Neonatal Tetanus Elimination: Where are We Now?
    Dhir, Shashi
    Dewan, Pooja
    Gupta, Piyush
    [J]. RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN TROPICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 : 247 - 261
  • [8] Neonatal Ebstein repair-where are we now?
    Wackel, Philip L.
    Dearani, Joseph A.
    Cetta, Frank
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (05)
  • [9] Biomarkers for acute kidney injury in children - where are we now?
    Sandokji, Ibrahim
    Greenberg, Jason H.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 35 (02) : 245 - 250
  • [10] Review of Diagnostic Biomarkers in Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Where Are We Now?
    Yokode, Masataka
    Shiokawa, Masahiro
    Kodama, Yuzo
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (05)