Factors impacting quality of experience in stereoscopic images

被引:2
|
作者
Xing, Liyuan [1 ]
You, Junyong [1 ]
Ebrahimi, Touradj [1 ]
Perkis, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ctr Quantifiable Qual Serv Commun Syst Q2S, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Quality of Experience (QoE); stereoscopic image; subjective quality test; scene content; camera baseline; screen size; viewing location; SIZE;
D O I
10.1117/12.872252
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The stereoscopic 3D industry has fallen short of achieving acceptable Quality of Experience (QoE) because of various technical limitations, such as excessive disparity, accommodation-convergence mismatch. This study investigates the effect of scene content, camera baseline, screen size and viewing location on stereoscopic QoE in a holistic approach. 240 typical test configurations are taken into account, in which a wide range of disparity constructed from the shooting conditions (scene content, camera baseline, sensor resolution/screen size) was selected from datasets, making the constructed disparities locate in different ranges of maximal disparity supported by viewing environment (viewing location). Second, an extensive subjective test is conducted using a single stimulus methodology, in which 15 samples at each viewing location were obtained. Finally, a statistical analysis is performed and the results reveal that scene content, camera baseline, as well as the interactions between screen size, scene content and camera baseline, have significant impact on QoE in stereoscopic images, while other factors, especially viewing location involved, have almost no significant impact. The generated Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) and the statistical results can be used to design stereoscopic quality metrics and validate their performance.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of Experience Assessment for Stereoscopic Images
    Qi, Feng
    Jiang, Tingting
    Ma, Siwei
    Zhao, Debin
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS 2012), 2012, : 1712 - 1715
  • [2] OBJECTIVE METRICS FOR QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE IN STEREOSCOPIC IMAGES
    Xing, Liyuan
    You, Junyong
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    Perkis, Andrew
    2011 18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2011,
  • [3] Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images
    Alexandre Benoit
    Patrick Le Callet
    Patrizio Campisi
    Romain Cousseau
    EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2008
  • [4] Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images
    Benoit, Alexandre
    Le Callet, Patrick
    Campisi, Patrizio
    Cousseau, Romain
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING, 2008, 2008 (1)
  • [5] Human factors for stereoscopic images
    Ukai, Kazuhiko
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO - ICME 2006, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1697 - 1700
  • [6] Learning based no-reference metric for assessing quality of experience of stereoscopic images
    Liu, Tsung-Jung
    Liu, Kuan-Hsien
    Shen, Kuan-Hung
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2019, 61 : 272 - 283
  • [7] Quality of Experience in a Stereoscopic Multiview Environment
    Ribeiro, Felipe M. L.
    de Oliveira, Jose F. L.
    Ciancio, Alexandre G.
    da Silva, Eduardo A. B.
    Estrada, Cassius R. D.
    Tavares, Luiz G. C.
    Gois, Jonathan N.
    Said, Amir
    Martelotte, Marcela C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2018, 20 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [8] VISUAL QUALITY PREDICTION ON DISTORTED STEREOSCOPIC IMAGES
    Lin, Ching-Ti
    Liu, Tsung-Jung
    Liu, Kuan-Hsien
    2017 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2017, : 3480 - 3484
  • [9] Using disparity for quality assessment of stereoscopic images
    Benoit, Alexandre
    Le Callet, Patrick
    Campisi, Patrizio
    Cousseau, Romain
    2008 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 389 - 392
  • [10] QUALITAS: Image Quality Assessment for Stereoscopic Images
    Fernandez-Maloigne, Christine
    Moreno, Jaime
    Rizzi, Alessandro
    Bonanomi, Cristian
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 60 (05)