共 50 条
The effectiveness of intradiscal biologic treatments for discogenic low back pain: a systematic review
被引:26
|作者:
Schneider, Byron J.
[1
]
Hunt, Christine
[2
]
Conger, Aaron
[3
]
Qu, Wenchun
[4
]
Maus, Timothy P.
[5
]
Vorobeychik, Yakov
[6
]
Cheng, Jianguo
[7
,8
]
Duszynski, Belinda
[9
]
McCormick, Zachary L.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Pain Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Utah, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Mayo Clin Florida, Dept Pain Med, Ctr Regenerat Med, Jacksonville, FL USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Dept Neurol, Penn State Hlth, Hershey, PA USA
[7] Cleveland Clin, Dept Pain Management, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[8] Cleveland Clin, Dept Neurosci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Spine Intervent Soc, Hinsdale, IL USA
来源:
关键词:
Back pain;
Biologics;
BMAC;
Discogenic pain;
Intradiscal injection;
PRP;
Stem cells;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC REPAIR;
BONE-MARROW-CELLS;
CLINICAL IMPORTANCE;
INJECTION;
DISEASE;
INTERVENTIONS;
SAFETY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.015
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There are limited treatments for discogenic low back pain. Intradiscal injections of biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells (SC) are theorized to have regenerative properties and have gained increasing interest as a possible treatment, but the evidence supporting their use in clinical practice is not yet well-defined. PURPOSE: Determine the effectiveness of intradiscal biologics for treating discogenic low back pain. STUDY DESIGN: PRISMA-compliant systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with discogenic low back pain confirmed by provocation discography or clinical and imaging findings consistent with discogenic pain. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with >50% pain relief after intradiscal biologic injection at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included >2-point pain score reduction on NRS; patient satisfaction; functional improvement; decreased use of other health care, including analgesics and surgery; and structural disc changes on MRI. METHODS: Comprehensive literature search performed in 2018 and updated in 2020. Interventions included were biologic therapies including mesenchymal stem cells, platelet rich plasma, microfragmented fat, amniotic membrane-based injectates, and autologous conditioned serum. Any other treatment (sham or active) was considered for comparative studies. Studies were independently reviewed. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 3,063 results, 37 studies were identified for full-text review, and 12 met established inclusion criteria for review. The quality of evidence on effectiveness of intradiscal biologics was very low. A single randomized controlled trial evaluating platelet rich plasma reported positive outcomes but had significant methodological flaws. A single trial that evaluated mesenchymal stem cells was negative. Success rates for platelet-rich plasma injectate in aggregate were 54.8% (95% Confidence Interval: 40%-70%). For mesenchymal stem cells, the aggregate success rate at six months was 53.5% (95% Confidence Interval: 38.6%-68.4%), though using worst-case analysis this decreased to 40.7% (95% Confidence Interval: 28.1%-53.2%). Similarly, >= 30% functional improvement was achieved in 74.3% (95% Confidence Interval: 59.8% -88.7%) at six months but using worst-case analysis, this decreased to 44.1% (95% Confidence Interval: 28.1%-53.2%). CONCLUSION: Limited observational data support the use of intradiscal biologic agents for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. According to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation System, the evidence supporting use of intradiscal mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma is very low quality. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 237
页数:12
相关论文