What Online Reviewer Behaviors Really Matter? Effects of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors on Detection of Fake Online Reviews

被引:196
|
作者
Zhang, Dongsong [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Lina [2 ]
Kehoe, Juan Luo [2 ]
Kilic, Isil Yakut [2 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Int Business Sch, Guangzhou Shi, Guangdong Sheng, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Informat Syst, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
deception detection; eWoM; electronic word of mouth; feature pruning; fake online reviews; online reviewer behavior; user-generated content; CONSUMER REVIEWS; PRODUCT REVIEWS; DECEPTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2016.1205907
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The value and credibility of online consumer reviews are compromised by significantly increasing yet difficult-to-identify fake reviews. Extant models for automated online fake review detection rely heavily on verbal behaviors of reviewers while largely ignoring their nonverbal behaviors. This research identifies a variety of nonverbal behavioral features of online reviewers and examines their relative importance for the detection of fake reviews in comparison to that of verbal behavioral features. The results of an empirical evaluation using real-world online reviews reveal that incorporating nonverbal features of reviewers can significantly improve the performance of online fake review detection models. Moreover, compared with verbal features, nonverbal features of reviewers are shown to be more important for fake review detection. Furthermore, model pruning based on a sensitivity analysis improves the parsimony of the developed fake review detection model without sacrificing its performance.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 481
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors in Online Bibliobattle Focusing on Listener Responses
    Nagai, Akililm
    Sumi, Yasuyuki
    2024 IEEE 48TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, COMPSAC 2024, 2024, : 2071 - 2076
  • [2] Verbal and nonverbal behaviors in the detection of lies
    Bouriche, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 28495 - 28495
  • [3] Detection of fake online hotel reviews
    Sandifer, Anna V.
    Wilson, Casey
    Olmsted, Aspen
    2017 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AND SECURED TRANSACTIONS (ICITST), 2017, : 501 - 502
  • [4] Fake Reviewer Group Detection in Online Review Systems
    Cao, Chen
    Li, Shihao
    Yu, Shuo
    Chen, Zhikui
    21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS ICDMW 2021, 2021, : 935 - 942
  • [5] Effects of Online Crowds on Self-Disclosure Behaviors in Online Reviews: A Multidimensional Examination
    Choi, HanByeol Stella
    Oh, Wonseok
    Kwak, Chanhee
    Lee, Junyeong
    Lee, Heeseok
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 39 (01) : 218 - 246
  • [6] In Search of Plagiarism Behaviors: An Empirical Study of Online Reviews
    Bao, Zhuolan
    Chau, Michael
    INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY INFORMATICS, PAISI 2015, 2015, 9074 : 102 - 112
  • [8] EFFECTS OF TEACHER VERBAL AND NONVERBAL BEHAVIORS ON STUDENT PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES
    WOOLFOLK, RL
    WOOLFOLK, AE
    AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1974, 11 (03) : 297 - 303
  • [9] Do Reviewers' Words and Behaviors Help Detect Fake Online Reviews and Spammers? Evidence From a Hierarchical Model
    Le, Thi-Kim-Hien
    Li, Yi-Zhen
    Li, Sheng-Tun
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 42167 - 42183
  • [10] Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews
    Kohl, Leonie Fm
    Crutzen, Rik
    de Vries, Nanne K.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (07) : 71 - 83