Pain Outcomes After Celiac Plexus Block in Children and Young Adults with Cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Anghelescu, Doralina L. [1 ]
Guo, Andy [1 ]
Morgan, Kyle J. [1 ]
Frett, Michael [1 ]
Prajapati, Hasmukh [2 ]
Gold, Robert [2 ]
Federico, Sara M. [3 ]
机构
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Pediat Med, Div Anesthesiol, 262 Danny Thomas Pl,Mail Stop 130, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[2] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Div Anesthesiol, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[3] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Div Anesthesiol, Dept Oncol, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
关键词
celiac plexus block; pain management; cancer; palliative care; pediatrics; PANCREATIC-CANCER; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1089/jayao.2018.0035
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The use of celiac plexus block (CPB) for abdominal pain has been extensively reported in adults. However, pediatric literature is limited to three single case reports and a series of three cases. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CPB in children and young adults (aged 8-20 years) with abdominal malignancies. Methods: Pain outcomes after CPB were evaluated in four children and young adults with cancer. Mean daily pain score (PS, 0-10) and morphine consumption (intravenous morphine equivalent daily [MED], mg/kg/day) before and after CPB were used to assess effectiveness. Results: Mean daily PS reduced after CPB in all patients. In one patient, this reduction was sustained up to 6 months of follow-up, and analgesics were discontinued 1 week after CPB. The other three patients had limited survival (6, 16, and 37 days) after CPB. One patient had a PS of 0 over the last few days of life, but the MED was escalated from 0.74 before the block to 5.4 mg/kg/day at the end of life. In the other two patients, MED was lower during the first week after CPB than that before CPB (4.55 vs. 1.59 and 2.88 vs. 1.51 mg/kg/day, respectively). As these two patients had disease progression during their last days of life, the MED was increased to 4.75 and 263.9 mg/kg/day, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that CPB may contribute to reducing PS and MED. We observed the use of CPB rather late in the disease trajectory.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 672
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Celiac plexus block for pancreatic cancer pain in adults
    Arcidiacono, Paolo G.
    Calori, Giliola
    Carrara, Silvia
    McNicol, Ewan D.
    Testoni, Pier A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (03):
  • [2] Celiac plexus block in cancer pain management
    Yamamuro, M
    Kusaka, K
    Kato, M
    Takahashi, M
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2000, 192 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [3] Celiac plexus block for visceral pain
    Carroll I.
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2006, 10 (1) : 20 - 25
  • [4] NEUROLYTIC CELIAC PLEXUS BLOCK FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER PAIN - A METAANALYSIS
    EISENBERG, E
    CARR, DB
    CHALMERS, TC
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (02): : 290 - 295
  • [5] CELIAC PLEXUS ALCOHOL BLOCK FOR UPPER ABDOMINAL CANCER PAIN
    SALAZAR, RG
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 140 (03): : 441 - 441
  • [6] NEUROLYTIC CELIAC PLEXUS BLOCK FOR PANCREATIC-CANCER PAIN
    BROWN, DL
    BULLEY, CK
    QUIEL, EL
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1987, 66 (09): : 869 - 873
  • [7] Assessment of Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis Outcomes and Technique in the Management of Refractory Visceral Cancer Pain
    Erdek, Michael A.
    Halpert, Daniel E.
    Fernandez, Marlis Gonzalez
    Cohen, Steven P.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (01) : 92 - 100
  • [8] Neurohistopathologic findings after a neurolytic celiac plexus block with alcohol in patients with pancreatic cancer pain
    Vranken, JH
    Zuurmond, WWA
    Van Kemenade, FJ
    Dzoljic, M
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 46 (07) : 827 - 830
  • [9] The role of neurolytic celiac plexus block in the treatment of pancreatic cancer pain
    Polati, E.
    Luzzani, A.
    Schweiger, V.
    Finco, G.
    Ischia, S.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (04) : 1200 - 1204
  • [10] CELIAC PLEXUS BLOCK VERSUS ANALGESICS IN PANCREATIC-CANCER PAIN
    MERCADANTE, S
    PAIN, 1993, 52 (02) : 187 - 192