Modified laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse: A feasibility study

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Xu, Xiaomin [1 ]
Xu, Jingui [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Gynecol, Quzhou Affiliated Hosp, Quzhou Peoples Hosp, Quzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
apical prolapse; modified laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension; pelvic organ prolapse; uterine preservation; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; OUTCOMES; MESH;
D O I
10.1111/jog.15393
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of modified laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension (LHUS) in women with apical prolapse who require uterine preservation. Methods This retrospective feasibility study analyzed the demographic characteristics, procedure, and 3-year follow-up data of 23 women who underwent modified LHUS at our institution. Outcome measures included clinical and anatomical cure. Patient satisfaction was measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). The improvement on quality of life was evaluated by pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-20). Results The operation time was 50 +/- 17 min, the blood loss was 100 ml (50-300 ml), and the postoperative hospital stay was 3.5 days (3-6 days). At a median follow-up time of 4.3 years (3-6 years), the clinical cure rate was 91.6% and the anatomical cure rate was 87.0%. The values of Aa, Ba, C, and D points were significantly higher than those observed before operation (p < 0.05). According to PGI-I, 20 patients were satisfied, and the overall subjective satisfaction rate was 87%. The scores of PFDI-20 after operation were significantly lower than those recorded before operation (p < 0.05). Conclusion Modified LHUS has the advantages of short operation time, fast postoperative recovery, low 3-year recurrence rate, and high patient satisfaction in women with apical prolapse who require uterine preservation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
引用
收藏
页码:2918 / 2925
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and high uterosacral ligament suspension for apical prolapse: a retrospective clinical study
    Yu, Y.
    Mei, L.
    Chen, Y.
    Cui, T.
    Wei, D.
    Niu, X.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [2] The laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) as effective treatment for apical prolapse: a systematic review
    Vermeulen, C.
    Meijs, P.
    Coolen, A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S173 - S173
  • [3] Midterm comparison of laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of moderate to severe apical prolapse
    Yiqi Guan
    Kun Zhang
    Jinsong Han
    Ying Yao
    Yiting Wang
    Junfang Yang
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 2501 - 2506
  • [4] Midterm comparison of laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of moderate to severe apical prolapse
    Guan, Yiqi
    Zhang, Kun
    Han, Jinsong
    Yao, Ying
    Wang, Yiting
    Yang, Junfang
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (10) : 2501 - 2506
  • [5] Techniques for Apical Prolapse Management: Cardinal Ligament Suspension and Extraperitoneal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
    Sun, X.
    Song, J.
    Sun, X.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S148 - S148
  • [6] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes
    Gabra, Martina G.
    Winget, Veronica
    Torabi, Mohammad T.
    Addis, Ilana
    Hatch, Kenneth
    Heusinkveld, John
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [7] Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results
    Peng, Juan
    Li, Shuqing
    Wang, Luwen
    Yang, Li
    Nai, Manman
    Xu, Qingqing
    Jin, Yuxi
    Liu, Peng
    Li, Lei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [8] Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results
    Juan Peng
    Shuqing Li
    Luwen Wang
    Li Yang
    Manman Nai
    Qingqing Xu
    Yuxi Jin
    Peng Liu
    Lei Li
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [9] Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Techniques for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Uterine Preserving Approach
    Edwards, A.
    Ramirez, Carter A.
    Kim-Fine, S.
    Scime, N., V
    Brennand, E. A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S393 - S393
  • [10] Clinical outcomes and uroflowmetry assessment in patients with apical prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension
    Ma, Yidi
    Zhang, Ye
    Ma, Congcong
    Wang, Yuan
    Tian, Weijie
    Zhu, Lan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 259 : 12 - 17