Liquefaction analysis: CPT versus SPT results at JFK airport

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad, Aly M.
Crincoli, Anthony
Armfield, Karen C.
机构
关键词
liquefaction analysis; JFK airport; SPT procedure; CPT procedure;
D O I
10.1142/S1793431108000220
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The design and construction of the new JetBlue 26-gate Terminal Facility at JFK Airport in New York City, USA was a complex and interesting endeavor for the Geotechnical Engineers at DMJM Harris. Once operational, the 635,000 sq. ft. facility will operate up to 250 daily flights; an estimated 20 million passengers a year. The new Jet Blue Terminal 5 incorporates the historical TWA Terminal, designed by Eero Saarinen in 1962. The main portion of this structure is being refurbished and incorporated into the new terminal. There were many challenging features to the design of this Project; including marrying the existing historical structure to the new terminal, preventing cross contamination in the aquifers below the site and achieving a design which will perform under seismic conditions. The challenge of the evaluation of the soil under seismic conditions is discussed herein. Liquefaction under seismic conditions at JFK Airport can be a key factor to foundation design and selection. Our investigation of the site incorporated the use of both Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) and Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) to closely identify the areas subject to liquefaction risk. A correlation between the results of both the analyses was established. This enabled us to determine the thickness of liquefiable zone and develop a cost effective design solution that will perform successfully should a seismic hazard occur in the future. The methodology utilized and the correlation observed will be presented in the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 31
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tailings Liquefaction Analysis Using Strength Ratios and SPT/CPT Results
    Pirete, W.
    Gomes, R. C.
    SOILS AND ROCKS, 2013, 36 (01): : 37 - 53
  • [2] Tailings liquefaction analysis using strength ratios and SPT/CPT results
    1600, Associacao Brasileira de Mecanica dos Solos (36):
  • [3] CPT & SPT Tests in Assessing Liquefaction Potential
    Hore, Ripon
    Chakraborty, Sudipta
    Arefin, M. R.
    Ansary, M. A.
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 51 (04): : 61 - 68
  • [4] SPT and CPT application for liquefaction evaluation in Greece
    Boumpoulis V.
    Depountis N.
    Pelekis P.
    Sabatakakis N.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (16)
  • [5] Evaluation of the liquefaction potential of soil deposits based on SPT and CPT test results
    Hanna, AM
    Ural, D
    Saygili, G
    Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures V, 2005, 81 : 43 - 52
  • [6] The Analysis of the Correlation between SPT and CPT Based on CNN-GA and Liquefaction Discrimination Research
    Bai, Ruihan
    Shen, Feng
    Zhao, Zihao
    Zhang, Zhiping
    Yu, Qisi
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2024, 138 (02): : 1159 - 1182
  • [7] Effect of Micropiles on Clean Sand Liquefaction Risk Based on CPT and SPT
    Farhangi, Visar
    Karakouzian, Moses
    Geertsema, Marten
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [8] SPT-CPT Correlation and Its Application for Liquefaction Evaluation in China
    Zhao, Xueliang
    Cai, Guojun
    MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) : 272 - 281
  • [9] Methods of pile design based on CPT and SPT results
    Bandini, P
    Salgado, R
    GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 967 - 976
  • [10] Spatial variability of liquefaction potential in regional mapping using CPT and SPT data
    Lenz, Jennifer A.
    Baise, Laurie G.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (07) : 690 - 702