Classical proofs via basic logic

被引:0
|
作者
Faggian, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Matemat Pura & Applicata, I-35100 Padua, Italy
来源
COMPUTER SCIENCE LOGIC | 1998年 / 1414卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Cut-elimination, besides being an important tool in proof-theory, plays a central role in the proofs-as-programs paradigm. In recent years this approach has been extended to classical logic (cf. Girard 1991, Parigot 1991, and recently Danos Joinet Schellinx 1997). This paper introduces a new sequent calculus for (propositional) classical logic, indicated by C-perpendicular to. Both, the calculus and the cut-elimination procedure for C-perpendicular to extend those for basic logic (Sambin Battilotti Faggian 1997). Two new structural rules are introduced, namely transfer and separation. As in basic logic, the cut rule has two forms, corresponding to substitution on the left and on the right, resulting in a tighter control over the cut. The control over the structural rules, achieved once they are kept distinct from the operational rules, results in a fine control over the form of the derivations. These features of C-perpendicular to benefit both the proof search and the cut-elimination process. In relation to the framework of basic logic, a remarkable result is that the extensions of basic logic (the ones that are "symmetric") are obtained by means of structural rules. Also, and in agreement with the spirit of uniformity propound in [Sambin 97], the procedure given here provides technical tools that allow us to treat cut-elimination for all such logics in a modular way.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 219
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The basic intuitionistic logic of proofs
    Artemov, Serge
    Iemhoff, Rosalie
    JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 2007, 72 (02) : 439 - 451
  • [2] A Constructive Logic with Classical Proofs and Refutations
    Barenbaum, Pablo
    Freund, Teodoro
    2021 36TH ANNUAL ACM/IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON LOGIC IN COMPUTER SCIENCE (LICS), 2021,
  • [3] Naming proofs in classical propositional logic
    Lamarche, F
    Strassburger, L
    TYPED LAMBDA CALCULI AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3461 : 246 - 261
  • [4] Normal Natural Deduction Proofs (in classical logic)
    Wilfried Sieg
    John Byrnes
    Studia Logica, 1998, 60 (1) : 67 - 106
  • [5] MEANING AND PROOFS - CONFLICT BETWEEN CLASSICAL AND INTUITIONISTIC LOGIC
    PRAWITZ, D
    THEORIA, 1977, 43 : 2 - 40
  • [6] EXPLICIT INDUCTION IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO CYCLIC PROOFS FOR CLASSICAL LOGIC WITH INDUCTIVE DEFINITIONS
    Berardi, Stefano
    Tatsuta, Makoto
    LOGICAL METHODS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2019, 15 (03)
  • [7] LOGIC OF PROOFS
    ARTEMOV, S
    ANNALS OF PURE AND APPLIED LOGIC, 1994, 67 (1-3) : 29 - 59
  • [8] SEMANTIC ENTAILMENT IN NONCLASSICAL LOGICS BASED ON PROOFS FOUND IN CLASSICAL-LOGIC
    CAFERRA, R
    DEMRI, S
    LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 607 : 385 - 399
  • [9] A Logic of Proofs for Differential Dynamic Logic
    Fulton, Nathan
    Platzer, Andre
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH ACM SIGPLAN CONFERENCE ON CERTIFIED PROGRAMS AND PROOFS (CPP'16), 2016, : 110 - 121
  • [10] A logic of interactive proofs
    Lehnherr, David
    Ognjanovic, Zoran
    Studer, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2022, 32 (08) : 1645 - 1658