Criteria selection for landfills: do we need a limitation on inorganic total content?

被引:8
|
作者
Mostbauer, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bodenkultur Wien, Dept Waste Management, IWGA, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00028-X
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The chemistry of the landfill environment is complex and dissolution rates may be higher than in natural systems. As will be shown in this paper, there are often great uncertainties in terms of leaching kinetics and long-term emissions of landfills in general. Leaching tests used in the laboratory may reflect a leaching behaviour not consistent with real landfill scenarios. Geochemical calculations for model systems provide an impression of the possible long-term behaviour of buffered, inorganic landfills. For a buffered carbonate-containing system (this system may be a mono-landfill of slag and/or ash after a few decades and/or centuries), maximums for the solubility of the elements Zn, Cd, Pb and Cu can be calculated while taking into account the presence of gypsum, the complexation in water ("speciation") and other factors influencing solubility. We have made these calculations using the recent version of the geochemical code PHREEQC-2. Finally, we conclude that under most circumstances the total elemental content, or the so-called "total availability," is a valuable assessment tool when combined with other criteria, such as leachable amounts and leachate test results. Exceptions may be carbonate-buffered monofill scenarios (e.g. monofill or quasi-monofill of MSWI residues), where setting limits on some elemental contents (Cu, Zn, Fe and Mn) does not seem to be very useful. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do we need landfills?
    Agamuthu, P.
    Law, H. James
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (10) : 1075 - 1077
  • [2] Do we need monitoring wells at double-lined landfills?
    Koerner, RM
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 71 (02): : 96 - 96
  • [3] Why do we need perceptual content?
    Shahmoradi, Ayoob
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 29 (05) : 776 - 788
  • [4] Do we need a Sexual Selection 2.0?
    Roughgarden, Joan
    Akcay, Erol
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 79 (03) : E1 - E4
  • [5] Appropriateness of diagnostic colonoscopy in the era of screening colonoscopy: Do we need better selection criteria?
    Adler, A
    Roll, S
    Marowski, B
    Drossel, R
    Rehs, HU
    Wiedenmann, B
    Roesch, T
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB246 - AB246
  • [6] CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR PROSTATE SPARING CYSTECTOMY: DO WE NEED TO TIGHTEN THEM?
    Saad, Mohamed M.
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Barret, Eric
    Galiano, Marc
    Rozet, Francois
    Cathala, Nathalie
    Mombet, Annick
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1277 - E1277
  • [7] Diagnosing diabetes mellitus – do we need new criteria?
    D. R. McCance
    R. L. Hanson
    D. J. Pettitt
    P. H. Bennett
    D. R. Hadden
    W. C. Knowler
    [J]. Diabetologia, 1997, 40 : 247 - 255
  • [8] Diagnosing diabetes mellitus - Do we need new criteria?
    McCance, DR
    Hanson, RL
    Pettitt, DJ
    Bennett, PH
    Hadden, DR
    Knowler, WC
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 1997, 40 (03) : 247 - 255
  • [9] Inorganic certified reference materials in 'water' - What do we have, what do we need?
    Kramer, KJM
    [J]. ANALYST, 1998, 123 (05) : 991 - 995
  • [10] Seronegative neurobrucellosis-do we need new neurobrucellosis criteria?
    Papadopoulos, Vassilis E.
    Patas, Kostas
    Tountopoulou, Argyro
    Velonakis, Georgios
    Boufidou, Fotini
    Chatzipanagiotou, Stylianos
    Vassilopoulou, Sofia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 111 : 124 - 126