Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies

被引:1
|
作者
Honda, Munenori [1 ]
Naoe, Hideaki [1 ]
Gushima, Ryosuke [1 ]
Miyamoto, Hideaki [1 ]
Tateyama, Masakuni [1 ]
Sakurai, Kouichi [2 ]
Oda, Yasushi [3 ]
Murakami, Yoshitaka [4 ]
Tanaka, Yasuhito [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kumamoto, Japan
[2] Hattori Clin, Kumamoto, Japan
[3] Oda GI Endoscopy & Gastroenterol Clin, Kumamoto, Japan
[4] Toho Univ, Dept Med Stat, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
CLINICAL IMPACT; CANCER; POLYPECTOMY; ADENOMAS; SOCIETY; YIELD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0245211
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Risk stratification by index colonoscopy is well established for first surveillance endoscopy, but whether the previous two colonoscopies affect the subsequent advanced neoplasias has not been established. Therefore, the subsequent risk based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies were investigated. This retrospective, cohort study was conducted in two clinics and included participants who had undergone two or more colonoscopies after index colonoscopy. High-risk was defined as advanced adenoma (>= 1 cm, or tubulovillous or villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia). Based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies, patients were classified into four categories: category A (both colonoscopy findings were normal), category B (no high-risk findings both times), category C (one time high-risk finding), and category D (high-risk findings both times). The incidence of subsequent advanced neoplasia was examined in each category. A total of 13,426 subjects were included and surveyed during the study periods. The subjects in category D had the highest risk of advanced neoplasia (27.4%, n = 32/117). The subjects in category A had the lowest risk (4.0%, n = 225/5,583). The hazard ratio for advanced neoplasia of category D compared to category A was 9.90 (95% Confidence interval 6.82-14.35, P<0.001). Classification based on the findings of index and first surveillance colonoscopies more effectively stratifies the risk of subsequent advanced neoplasia, resulting in more proper allocation of colonoscopy resources after two consecutive colonoscopies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Stratification for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia
    Berstad, Paula
    Loberg, Magnus
    Kalager, Mette
    Jorgensen, Anita
    Garborg, Kjetil
    Ruud, Hans Kristian
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Hoff, Geir
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (12) : 1405 - 1405
  • [2] Risk of Advanced Adenoma on the 2nd Surveillance Colonoscopy Based on Findings of the Index and 1st Surveillance Colonoscopies
    Morelli, Michael
    Juluri, Ravi
    Glowinski, Elizabeth
    Johnson, Cynthia
    Imperiale, Thomas
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S577 - S577
  • [3] Risk Stratification for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia-Response
    Schroy, Paul C., III
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (12) : 1406 - 1406
  • [4] Incidence of advanced neoplasia after low-risk adenoma in surveillance colonoscopies
    Hamarneh, Z.
    Cock, C.
    Young, G.
    Bampton, P.
    Fraser, R.
    Symonds, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 : 220 - 221
  • [5] The Your Disease Risk Index for Colorectal Cancer Is an Inaccurate Risk Stratification Tool for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy
    Schroy, Paul C., III
    Coe, Alison M.
    Mylvaganam, Shamini R.
    Ahn, Lynne B.
    Lydotes, Maria A.
    Robinson, Patricia A.
    Davis, Julie T.
    Chen, Clara A.
    Ashba, Jacqueline
    Atkinson, Michael L.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Heeren, Timothy C.
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (08) : 1044 - 1052
  • [6] Yield of the second surveillance colonoscopy based on the results of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies
    Morelli, Michael Samuel
    Glowinski, Elizabeth A.
    Juluri, Ravi
    Johnson, Cynthia S.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (10) : 821 - 826
  • [7] Advanced colorectal neoplasia risk stratification by penalized logistic regression
    Lin, Yunzhi
    Yu, Menggang
    Wang, Sijian
    Chappell, Richard
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 1677 - 1691
  • [8] Your disease risk (YDR) and risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia (Acn)
    Schroy, Paul C.
    Ahn, Lynne B.
    Glick, Julie
    Robinson, Patricia
    Lydotes, Maria
    Mylvaganam, Shamini
    Ashba, Jacqueline
    Atkinson, Michael
    Colditz, Graham A.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A185 - A185
  • [9] Fecal hemoglobin concentration is useful for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia
    Kim, Nam Hee
    Kwon, Min-Jung
    Kim, Hyun-young
    Lee, Taeheon
    Jeong, Seok Hyeon
    Park, Dong Il
    Choi, Kyuyong
    Jung, Yoon Suk
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2016, 48 (06) : 667 - 672
  • [10] Fecal Hemoglobin Concentration Is Useful for Risk Stratification of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia
    Kim, Nam Hee
    Jung, Yoon Suk
    Park, Dongil
    Sohn, Chong Il
    Choi, Kyu Yong
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S762 - S762