Detection of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes in pooled test portion samples of processed dairy products

被引:11
|
作者
Jagadeesan, Balamurugan [1 ]
Schmid, Viktoria Bastic [1 ]
Kupski, Brian [2 ]
McMahon, Wendy [2 ]
Klijn, Adrianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Nestec Ltd, Nestle Inst Food Safety & Analyt Sci, Nestle Res, CH-1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland
[2] Merieux NutriSci, Silliker Food Sci Ctr, Crete, IL 60417 USA
关键词
Analytical pooling validation; Relative limit of detection; Matrix effect; Sample preparation; Pre-enrichment; Pre-warming; VALIDATION; ENRICHMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.017
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Listeria monocytogenes is a major foodborne pathogen. Testing multiple portions of the same final product is often required to verify the effectiveness of a food safety management system. Therefore, it will be advantageous to the laboratories to combine these test portions and process as one sample. However, combining samples for analysis, i.e., pooling, can be done only if there is no negative impact on the result. The objective of this study was to validate pooling of test portions for the detection of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in dairy products as no scientific evidence currently exists to support this practice. Six representative matrices, namely, pudding, yogurt, brie cheese, 2% milk, ice cream and infant formula were spiked separately with stressed L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in 25 g and pooled test portions (375 g/250 g/125 g). Two methods, namely, ISO-11290-1:1996 Arnd1:2004 and a validated alternative method Rapid'L.Mono were used for sample testing. Performance of a method in pooled test portions was considered to be satisfactory if the relative limit of detection (RLOD50;LOD50 [pooled test portion]/LOD50 [25 g test portion]) and limit of detection (LOD50) obtained was <= 2.5 and 1 CFU or MPN, respectively. Results obtained from L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. trials were given equal weightage to decide on the impact of pooling. Acceptable RLOD50 and LOD50 values were consistently obtained in L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. inoculation experiments when test portions were pooled up to 125 g for all matrices tested with both methods. While there was a slight delay for the primary enrichment of the pooled test portions to reach the desired incubation temperature when compared to the 25 g test portions, it did not negatively impact the outcome when samples were pooled up to 125 g. Background organisms were in general present at low concentrations and did not seem to adversely impact the recovery of the target organism in 125 g samples. Thus, pooling of test portions to up to 125 g for the detection of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. by two culture methods in processed dairy products has been validated.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 39
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of the SureTect Detection Methods for Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in Meat, Dairy, Fish, and Vegetable Products
    David Rodriguez-Lazaro
    Patricia Gonzalez-García
    Antonio Valero
    Marta Hernandez
    [J]. Food Analytical Methods, 2015, 8 : 1 - 6
  • [2] Application of the SureTect Detection Methods for Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in Meat, Dairy, Fish, and Vegetable Products
    Rodriguez-Lazaro, David
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Patricia
    Valero, Antonio
    Hernandez, Marta
    [J]. FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2015, 8 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [3] Chitin hydrolysis by Listeria spp., including L. monocytogenes
    Leisner, J. J.
    Larsen, M. H.
    Jorgensen, R. L.
    Brondsted, L.
    Thomsen, L. E.
    Ingmer, H.
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 74 (12) : 3823 - 3830
  • [4] Genegen technology for detection of Salmonella spp. and genus Listeria/listeria monocytogenes in chicken samples
    Vollenhofer-Schrumpf, Sabine
    Buresch, Ronald
    Unger, Gabriele
    Stahl, Nicole
    Fraenzl, Gert
    Schinkinger, Manfred
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RAPID METHODS AND AUTOMATION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 14 (02): : 161 - 181
  • [5] Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes IN RAW GOAT'S MILK
    Yolanda Albarracin, C.
    Raul Poutou, P.
    Ana Carrascal, C.
    [J]. REVISTA MVZ CORDOBA, 2008, 13 (02) : 1326 - 1332
  • [6] IMPROVED SENSITIVITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE PCR METHOD FOR DETECTION OF Listeria spp. AND L. monocytogenes IN MILK
    Lakicevic, Brankica
    Stjepanovic, Aleksandra
    Tolinacki, Maja
    Golic, Natasa
    Topisirovic, L.
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA-BEOGRAD, 2011, 61 (2-3): : 239 - 245
  • [7] Incidences of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in meat and by-products
    Meyer, Cornelia
    Stolle, Andreas
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2009, 89 (05): : 110 - 112
  • [8] Occurrence of Listeria spp. in processed fishery products
    Jeyasekaran, G
    Karunasagar, I
    Karunasagar, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE, 2002, 39 (02): : 188 - 190
  • [9] Comparison of two multiplex PCR assays for the detection of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in biological samples
    Budniak, Sylwia
    Kedrak-Jablonska, Agnieszka
    Szczawinska, Anna
    Reksa, Monika
    Krupa, Marek
    Szulowski, Krzysztof
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (04) : 411 - 416
  • [10] Reveal® Listeria 2.0 Test for Detection of Listeria spp. in Foods and Environmental Samples
    Alles, Susan
    Curry, Stephanie
    Almy, David
    Jagadeesan, Balamurugan
    Rice, Jennifer
    Mozola, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 95 (02) : 424 - 434