Root growth in field-grown winter wheat: Some effects of soil conditions, season and genotype

被引:67
|
作者
Hodgkinson, L. [1 ]
Dodd, I. C. [1 ]
Binley, A. [1 ]
Ashton, R. W. [2 ]
White, R. P. [2 ]
Watts, C. W. [2 ]
Whalley, W. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[2] Rothamsted Res, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Wheat roots; Soil structure; Penetrometer resistance; Genotypic effects; WATER-UPTAKE; STRUCTURED SOIL; DWARFING GENES; GRAIN-YIELD; ELONGATION; TRAITS; SYSTEM; MODEL; IRRIGATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2017.09.014
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This work compared root length distributions of different winter wheat genotypes with soil physical measurements, in attempting to explain the relationship between root length density and soil depth. Field experiments were set up to compare the growth of various wheat lines, including near isogenic lines (Rht-B1a Tall NIL and Rht-B1c Dwarf NIL) and wheat lines grown commercially (cv. Battalion, Hystar Hybrid, Istabraq, and Robigus). Experiments occurred in two successive years under rain fed conditions. Soil water content, temperature and penetrometer resistance profiles were measured, and soil cores taken to estimate vertical profiles of pore distribution, and root number with the core-break method and by root washing. Root length distributions differed substantially between years. Wetter soil in 2014/2015 was associated with shallower roots. Although there was no genotypic effect in 2014/2015 , in 2013/2014 the dwarf wheat had the most roots at depth. In the shallower layers, some wheat lines, especially Battalion, seemed better at penetrating non-structured soil. The increase in penetrometer resistance with depth was a putative explanation for the rapid decrease in root length density with depth. Differences between the two years in root profiles were greater than those due to genotype, suggesting that comparisons of different genotypic effects need to take account of different soil conditions and seasonal differences. We also demonstrate that high yields are not necessarily linked to resource acquisition, which did not seem to be limiting in the low yielding dwarf NIL.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 83
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ROOT SOIL CONTACT OF FIELD-GROWN WINTER-WHEAT
    VANNOORDWIJK, M
    SCHOONDERBEEK, D
    KOOISTRA, MJ
    [J]. GEODERMA, 1993, 56 (1-4) : 277 - 286
  • [2] Genotype and fungicide effects on late-season root growth of winter wheat
    K. E. Ford
    P. J. Gregory
    M. J. Gooding
    S. Pepler
    [J]. Plant and Soil, 2006, 284 : 33 - 44
  • [3] Genotype and fungicide effects on late-season root growth of winter wheat
    Ford, K. E.
    Gregory, P. J.
    Gooding, M. J.
    Pepler, S.
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 2006, 284 (1-2) : 33 - 44
  • [4] Impacts of ozone on the growth and yield of field-grown winter wheat
    Ollerenshaw, JH
    Lyons, T
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1999, 106 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [5] Infection of field-grown winter wheat by Cephalosporium gramineum and the effect of soil pH
    Stiles, CM
    Murray, TD
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1996, 86 (02) : 177 - 183
  • [6] Ozone exposure of field-grown winter wheat affects soil mesofauna in the rhizosphere
    Schrader, Stefan
    Bender, Juergen
    Weigel, Hans-Joachim
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2009, 157 (12) : 3357 - 3362
  • [7] THE REDISTRIBUTION OF ASSIMILATE IN FIELD-GROWN WINTER-WHEAT
    BELL, CJ
    INCOLL, LD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1990, 41 (229) : 949 - 960
  • [8] Early root development of field-grown poplar: effects of planting material and genotype
    Douglas, Grant B.
    McIvor, Ian R.
    Lloyd-West, Catherine M.
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF FORESTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 46 : 1 - 14
  • [9] ROOT SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION OF FIELD-GROWN WHEAT GENOTYPES
    MIAN, MAR
    NAFZIGER, ED
    KOLB, FL
    TEYKER, RH
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (03) : 810 - 812
  • [10] SOIL-TEMPERATURE LIMITATION TO WATER-USE BY FIELD-GROWN WINTER-WHEAT
    WRAITH, JM
    FERGUSON, AH
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (06) : 974 - 979