Plasma simulation studies using multilevel physics models

被引:248
|
作者
Park, W [1 ]
Belova, EV
Fu, GY
Tang, XZ
Strauss, HR
Sugiyama, LE
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] NYU, New York, NY USA
[3] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.873437
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The question of how to proceed toward ever more realistic plasma simulation studies using ever increasing computing power is addressed. The answer presented here is the M3D (Multilevel 3D) project, which has developed a code package with a hierarchy of physics levels that resolve increasingly complete subsets of phase-spaces and are thus increasingly more realistic. The rationale for the multilevel physics models is given. Each physics level is described and examples of its application are given. The existing physics levels are fluid models (3D configuration space), namely magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and two-fluids; and hybrid models, namely gyrokinetic-energetic-particle/MHD (5D energetic particle phase-space), gyrokinetic-particle-ion/ fluid-electron (5D ion phase-space), and full-kinetic-particle-ion/fluid-electron level (6D ion phase-space). Resolving electron phase-space (5D or 6D) remains a future project. Phase-space-fluid models are not used in favor of delta f particle models. A practical and accurate nonlinear fluid closure for noncollisional plasmas seems not likely in the near future. (C) 1999 American Institute of Physics. [S1070-664X(99)93005-7].
引用
收藏
页码:1796 / 1803
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving Wireless Link Simulation Using Multilevel Markov Models
    Kamthe, Ankur
    Carreira-Perpinan, Miguel A.
    Cerpa, Alberto E.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS, 2013, 10 (01)
  • [2] Multi-physics plasma simulation by the interlocking of two different hybrid models
    Sugiyama, T.
    Kusano, K.
    NUMERICAL MODELING OF SPACE PLASMA FLOWS: ASTRONUM-2007, 2008, 385 : 228 - 233
  • [3] PHYSICS INFORMATION AIDED KRIGING USING STOCHASTIC SIMULATION MODELS\ast
    Yang, Xiu
    Tartakovsky, Guzel
    Tartakovsky, Alexandre M.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2021, 43 (06): : A3862 - A3891
  • [4] ANALOG COMPUTER SIMULATION IN PLASMA PHYSICS
    SHEN, K
    ALTON, ED
    HSUAN, HCS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1970, 38 (09) : 1133 - &
  • [5] PARTICLE SIMULATION METHODS IN PLASMA PHYSICS
    EASTWOOD, JW
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1986, 43 (01) : 89 - 106
  • [6] Multi-Physics Models and Simulation
    Mukesh, Sagarika
    Kim, Yong-Hoon
    IEEE NANOTECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2024, 18 (06) : 3 - 3
  • [7] Using Shrinkage in Multilevel Models to Understand Intersectionality A Simulation Study and a Guide for Best Practice
    Bell, Andrew
    Holman, Daniel
    Jones, Kelvyn
    METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019, 15 (02) : 88 - 96
  • [8] COMPUTER-SIMULATION OF NONLINEAR PLASMA PHYSICS
    FEIX, MR
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 1973, 13 (06) : 947 - 947
  • [9] A PLASMA SOURCE FOR MIRROR PHYSICS SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS
    VANDEGRIFT, G
    DONAHUE, K
    VELAT, D
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1991, 62 (04): : 906 - 908
  • [10] Statistical physics models for nacre fracture simulation
    Nukala, PKVV
    Simunovic, S
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2005, 72 (04):