Delirium screening in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:100
|
作者
Neto, Ary Serpa [1 ]
Nassar, Antonio P., Jr. [2 ]
Cardoso, Sergio O. [1 ]
Manetta, Jose A. [1 ]
Pereira, Victor G. M. [1 ]
Esposito, Daniel C. [1 ]
Damasceno, Maria C. T. [1 ]
Slooter, Arjen J. [3 ]
机构
[1] ABC Med Sch FMABC, Med Intens Care Unit, Santo Andre, Brazil
[2] Sao Camilo Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Intens Care Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
bedside; critical care; delirium; meta-analysis; review; screening; CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; SEARCH STRATEGIES; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; ICU PATIENTS; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; RELIABILITY; TRANSLATION;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e16c9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Despite its frequency and impact, delirium in critically ill patients is poorly recognized. Our aim was to systematically review the accuracy of delirium screening instruments in critically ill patients. Data Source: Systematic review and meta-analysis of publications between 1966 and 2011. The Medline and Embase databases were searched for studies on delirium in critically ill patients. Study Selection: The meta-analysis was limited to studies in critically ill patients in intensive care units, surgical wards, or emergency rooms. The delirium screening tool had to be feasible in a clinical setting for use by a nonexpert. As the gold standard, delirium had to be diagnosed based on appropriate criteria by a delirium expert. Data Extraction:The outcomes assessed were sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and summary receiver operating characteristics curves. Data Synthesis: Sixteen studies covering 1,523 participants and five screening tools were included in the systematic review. The pooled sensitivities and specificities of Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit for detection of delirium in critically ill patients were 75.5% and 95.8%, and for Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist 80.1% and 74.6%, respectively. All but one study was performed in a research setting, and that one study suggested that with routine use of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, half of the patients with delirium were not detected. Conclusions: The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit was the most specific bedside tool for the assessment of delirium in critically ill patients. However, there was significant heterogeneity of the results. These findings were largely obtained in research settings, and the low sensitivity of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in routine, daily practice may limit its use as a screening test. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1946-1951)
引用
收藏
页码:1946 / 1951
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Delirium screening in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    A Serpa Neto
    AP Nassar Júnior
    SO Cardoso
    JA Manetta
    VG Pereira
    DC Esposito
    MC Damasceno
    AJ Slooter
    [J]. Critical Care, 16 (Suppl 1):
  • [2] Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Salluh, Jorge I. F.
    Wang, Han
    Schneider, Eric B.
    Nagaraja, Neeraja
    Yenokyan, Gayane
    Damluji, Abdulla
    Serafim, Rodrigo B.
    Stevens, Robert D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350 : 1 - 10
  • [3] The impact of analgosedation on mortality and delirium in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Cui-Ting
    Mao, Yong
    Zhao, Ling
    Ma, Bin
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2019, 54 : 7 - 14
  • [4] Role of dexmedetomidine in the treatment of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Xu
    Xiong, Jie
    Tang, Yan
    Gong, Chen-Chen
    Wang, Di-Fen
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2021, 87 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [5] Early mobilisation for prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nydahl, Peter
    Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen
    Vater, Vanessa
    Sivarajah, Sayantha
    Howroyd, Fiona
    McWilliams, David
    Osterbrink, Jurgen
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 74
  • [6] Assessment of melatonergics in prevention of delirium in critically ill patients A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Yibing
    Jiang, Zhiming
    Huang, Huibin
    Wang, Yang
    Zhang, Linlin
    Ren, Chao
    Yao, Yongming
    Li, Wei
    Du, Bin
    Xi, Xiuming
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (02)
  • [7] Effect of occupational therapy on the occurrence of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Jun
    Fan, Kaipeng
    Zheng, Suqin
    Xie, Guangyao
    Niu, Xuekang
    Pang, Jinkuo
    Zhang, Huihuang
    Wu, Xin
    Qu, Jiayang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [8] Effectiveness of sleep interventions to reduce delirium in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Teng, Jiao
    Qin, Hanzhi
    Guo, Wenchao
    Liu, Jialong
    Sun, Jian
    Zhang, Zhenwei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 78
  • [9] Diagnostic Performance of Delirium Assessment Tools in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ho, Mu-Hsing
    Montgomery, Amy
    Traynor, Victoria
    Chang, Chia-Chi
    Kuo, Ken N.
    Chang, Hui-Chen
    Chen, Kee-Hsin
    [J]. WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2020, 17 (04) : 301 - 310
  • [10] ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF DELIRIUM IN CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Shen Wei
    Hu Xiaocong
    Xu Wenhao
    [J]. SHOCK, 2019, 51 (06): : 81 - 81