Newborn low birth weight: do socio-economic inequality still persist in India?

被引:15
|
作者
Mishra, Prem Shankar [1 ]
Sinha, Debashree [2 ]
Kumar, Pradeep [3 ]
Srivastava, Shobhit [3 ]
Bawankule, Rahul [4 ]
机构
[1] Populat Res Ctr, Inst Social & Econ Change, Bengaluru 560072, Karnataka, India
[2] Int Inst Populat Sci, Dept Dev Studies, Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India
[3] Int Inst Populat Sci, Dept Math Demog & Stat, Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India
[4] Int Inst Populat Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Mortal Studies, Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Low birth weight; Socio-economic inequality; Concentration index; Decomposition; India; DETERMINANTS; WOMEN; RISK; CARE; PREVALENCE; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; ANEMIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-021-02988-3
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background The incidence of preterm birth and subsequent low birth weight (LBW) are vital global public health issues. It contributes to high infant and child mortality in the early stages of life and later on in adult life; it increases the risk for non-communicable diseases. The study aims to understand the socio-economic status-related inequality for LBW among children in India. It hypothesises that there is no association between the socio-economic status of the household and the newborn's LBW in India. Methods The study utilised data from the fourth round of the National Family Health Survey, a national representative cross-sectional survey conducted in 2015-16 (N = 127,141). The concentration index (CCI) and the concentration curve (CC) measured socio-economic inequality in low birth status among newborns. Wagstaff decomposition further analysed key contributors in CCI by segregating significant covariates. Results About 18.2% of children had low birth weight status. The value of concentration was - 0.05 representing that low birth weight status is concentrated among children from lower socio-economic status. Further, the wealth quintile explained 76.6% of the SES related inequality followed by regions of India (- 44%) and the educational status of mothers (43.4%) for LBW among children in India. Additionally, the body mass index of the women (28.4%), ante-natal care (20.8%) and residential status (- 15.7%) explained SES related inequality for LBW among children in India. Conclusion Adequate attention should be given to the mother's nutritional status. Awareness of education and usage of health services during pregnancy should be promoted. Further, there is a need to improve the coverage and awareness of the ante-natal care (ANC) program. In such cases, the role of the health workers is of utmost importance. Programs on maternal health services can be merged with maternal nutrition to bring about an overall decline in the LBW of children in India.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Newborn low birth weight: do socio-economic inequality still persist in India?
    Prem Shankar Mishra
    Debashree Sinha
    Pradeep Kumar
    Shobhit Srivastava
    Rahul Bawankule
    [J]. BMC Pediatrics, 21
  • [2] Socio-Economic and Nutritional Determinants of Low Birth Weight in India
    Kader, Manzur
    Perera, Nirmala K. P.
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 6 (07) : 302 - 308
  • [3] Still Unequal at Birth: Birth Weight, Socio-economic Status and Outcomes at Age 9
    McGovern, Mark E.
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REVIEW, 2013, 44 (01) : 53 - 84
  • [4] Maternal Hypertension and Low Birth Weight: Do Socio-Economic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities Matter?
    Sergeev, Alexander V.
    Nyirati, Christina M.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (21)
  • [5] Socio-economic inequality of immunization coverage in India
    Lauridsen J.
    Pradhan J.
    [J]. Health Economics Review, 1 (1) : 1 - 6
  • [6] Association of Maternal Nutritional Status, Body Composition and Socio-economic Variables with Low Birth Weight in India
    Sen, Jaydip
    Roy, Arpita
    Mondal, Nitish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2010, 56 (04) : 254 - 259
  • [7] Do socio-economic inequalities in infant growth in rural India operate through maternal size and birth weight?
    Griffiths, Paula L.
    Balakrishna, Nagalla
    Rao, Sylvia Fernandez
    Johnson, William
    [J]. ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2016, 43 (02) : 154 - 163
  • [8] Frequency of Low Birth Weight in newborns of different socio-economic groups in Rawalpindi
    Sadiq, Tahira
    Rashid, Farah
    Bhatti, Ayaz
    [J]. RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 37 (01): : 61 - 63
  • [9] Low socio-economic groups are not overweight in India
    Subramanyam, Malavika A.
    Subramanian, S. V.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 133 (01) : 119 - 120
  • [10] Socio-economic inequality and altruism
    Davydov, Ilkhom
    Nikolskaya, Anastasia
    Podbiralina, Galina
    Mrochkovsky, Nikolay
    Chuvilova, Oksana
    [J]. AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2022, 11 (55): : 306 - 317