Scheduling of build and post processes for decomposed parts in additive manufacturing

被引:3
|
作者
Oh, Yosep [1 ]
Cho, Yongkyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Ind & Management Engn, Suwon 16227, Gyeonggi, South Korea
[2] Kangnam Univ, Dept Ind & Management Engn, Yongin 16979, Gyeonggi, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Scheduling; Process planning; Post-processing; 3D printing; ORDER ACCEPTANCE; TAXONOMY; POLYHEDRA; PACKING; DESIGN; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2022.103164
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Recently, production planning has been highlighted in the Additive Manufacturing (AM) literature. However, most AM studies have focused on a build process performed by an AM machine (also known as a 3D printer). Compared to the build process, AM studies for post-processing have lagged behind in production planning at the macro level. Post-processing needs highly sophisticated and complicated tasks requiring a lot of process time and cost. Therefore, some AM systems need to primarily cover post-processing as well as the build process, which leads to a more comprehensive approach to production planning. This paper addresses the AM systems based on flow-shop, comprehensively including the build and post processes. For post-processing, we consider trimming, coloring, and assembly processes. This paper introduces three scheduling policies: (1) all-for-one-job; (2) one-for-one-job; and (3) hybrid. The first policy is packing every part into the same job, which means that all parts are simultaneously fabricated during the same build process. The second policy is assigning each part to a particular job, which results in parts being fabricated one by one during the build process. The last policy is a compromise between the former two policies. We propose a mixed-integer programming (MIP) model to minimize the makespan for each policy. In computational experiments with test models, the scheduling optimization for AM is applied to various cases: multiple parts, scheduling policies, and multiple AM machines. One of the main comparisons provides that the MIP model of the hybrid policy is more preferred than the all-for-one-job policy, reducing the makespan by 27.68%. In conclusion, our paper quantitatively shows that packing is not a significant factor in minimizing the makespan when comprehensively considering build and post processes. It is a different perspective from that the traditional scheduling for AM has focused on a packing issue to improve the productivity in the build process.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hybridization of additive manufacturing processes to build ceramic/metal parts: Example of HTCC
    Raynaud, Jonathan
    Pateloup, Vincent
    Bernard, Megane
    Gourdonnaud, Delphine
    Passerieux, Damien
    Cros, Dominique
    Madrangeas, Valerie
    Michaud, Philippe
    Chartier, Thierry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2021, 41 (03) : 2023 - 2033
  • [2] Hybridization of additive manufacturing processes to build ceramic/metal parts: Example of LTCC
    Raynaud, Jonathan
    Pateloup, Vincent
    Bernard, Megane
    Gourdonnaud, Delphine
    Passerieux, Damien
    Cros, Dominique
    Madrangeas, Valerie
    Chartier, Thierry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2020, 40 (03) : 759 - 767
  • [3] Additive manufacturing processes and materials for spare parts
    Salmi, Mika
    Pei, Eujin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 37 (11) : 5979 - 5990
  • [4] Additive manufacturing processes and materials for spare parts
    Salmi Mika
    Eujin Pei
    [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2023, 37 : 5979 - 5990
  • [5] Additive manufacturing scheduling problem considering assembly operations of parts
    Arik, Oguzhan Ahmet
    [J]. OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (03) : 3063 - 3087
  • [6] Additive manufacturing scheduling problem considering assembly operations of parts
    Oğuzhan Ahmet Arık
    [J]. Operational Research, 2022, 22 : 3063 - 3087
  • [7] Smart Build-Plate for Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes
    Hehr, Adam
    Norfolk, Mark
    Kominsky, Dan
    Boulanger, Andrew
    Davis, Matthew
    Boulware, Paul
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (02)
  • [8] An Investigation into Additive Manufacturing Material Tensile Properties for Different Build Orientations of Parts
    Benham, Robert
    Rehman, Fayyaz
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXI, 2017, 6 : 160 - 165
  • [9] Investigation of additive manufacturing processes for the manufacture of parts with designed mesostructure
    Williams, Christopher B.
    Mistree, Farrokh
    Rosen, David W.
    [J]. DETC 2005: ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2005, VOL 4, 2005, : 353 - 364
  • [10] Design of test parts to characterize micro additive manufacturing processes
    Thompson, Mary Kathryn
    Mischkot, Michael
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AXIOMATIC DESIGN (ICAD 2015), 2015, 34 : 223 - 228