Dynamics of naval ship design: A systems approach

被引:10
|
作者
Laverghetta, T [1 ]
Brown, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Jacksonville Detachement, Ingleside, TX 78362 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-3584.1999.tb01981.x
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
In today's cost-constrained environment, acquisition reform is a critical component in the design, production, and support of modern warships. This reform includes policies that require system acquisition programs to pursue commercial management and systems engineering practices. The application of Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD), concurrent engineering, open systems architecture, Total Quality Management (TQM), and integrated Design Environments (IDE) have produced noteworthy commercial successes. Many defense acquisition programs have followed suite, implementing similar process improvements. However, as many commercial industries are finding, there are limits to the success of these improvements. Using the methods of System Dynamics, this paper examines the mechanisms which have lead to program instabilities in cost, schedule, and effectiveness. Modeling of these mechanisms provides a means to study past programs, and assess the potential savings that can be generated with the introduction of process improvements. As a case study, the paper examines the structures and resultant trends that impacted the design and acquisition of DDG 51. General process structures are studied including design interactions, schedule, resources, and allocation. Specific dynamic relationships between cost thresholds, design effort and schedule are studied to show the ability of modeling to capture dynamic trends and predict results. Finally, a "what-if?" scenario that looks at the application of IPPD is examined.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 323
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systems engineering in naval ship design
    Calvano, CN
    Jons, O
    Keane, RG
    [J]. NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2000, 112 (04) : 45 - 57
  • [2] Systems Engineering in Naval Ship Design Introduction
    Helgerson, David A.
    [J]. NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2021, 133 (02) : 36 - 49
  • [3] Systems Engineering for Naval Ship Design Evolution
    Bottero, Mattia
    Gualeni, Paola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [4] Modeling and simulation of piping systems for naval ship design
    Reynolds, J
    Kloetzli, JW
    Schuler, RW
    [J]. 1996 MODELING, SIMULATION AND VIRTUAL PROTOTYPING CONFERENCE: A FORUM FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION APPLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE ACQUISITION PROCESS, 1996, : 195 - 206
  • [5] Weight Design Margins in Naval Ship Design-A Rational Approach
    Pedatzur, C. D. R. Omri
    [J]. NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2016, 128 (02) : 57 - 64
  • [6] A comprehensive approach to survivability assessment in naval ship concept design
    Piperakis, A.S.
    Andrews, D.J.
    [J]. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2014, 156 : 375 - 376
  • [7] Approach to Capability-Based System-of-Systems Framework in Support of Naval Ship Design
    Olivier, Jacques P.
    Balestrini-Robinson, Santiago
    Briceno, Simon
    [J]. 2014 8TH ANNUAL IEEE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON), 2014, : 388 - 395
  • [8] A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO SURVIVABILITY ASSESSMENT IN NAVAL SHIP CONCEPT DESIGN
    Piperakis, A. S.
    Andrews, D. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2014, 156 : A333 - A352
  • [9] A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO SURVIVABILITY ASSESSMENT IN NAVAL SHIP CONCEPT DESIGN
    Piperakis, A.S.
    Andrews, D.J.
    [J]. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2014, 156 (A4):
  • [10] A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO SURVIVABILITY ASSESSMENT IN NAVAL SHIP CONCEPT DESIGN
    Piperakis, A. S.
    Andrews, D. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2014, 156 : A375 - A378