The accuracy of the BLS productivity measures

被引：0
|
作者：
Dean, ER [1 ]
机构：
[1] US Bur Labor Stat, Off Prod & Technol, Washington, DC 20212 USA
来源：
MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW | 1999年 / 122卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号：
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要：
Overall productivity growth may be somewhat underestimated; despite continued progress, measurement and conceptual barriers remain.
引用
收藏
页码：24 / 34
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How price indexes affect BLS productivity measures
    Eldridge, LP
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1999, 122 (02) : 35 - 46
  • [2] Bringing work home: implications for BLS productivity measures
    Eldridge, Lucy P.
    Pabilonia, Sabrina Wulff
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 2010, 133 (12) : 18 - 35
  • [3] BLS publishes experimental state-level labor productivity measures
    Pabilonia, Sabrina Wulff
    Jadoo, Michael W.
    Khandrika, Bhavani
    Price, Jennifer
    Mildenberger, James D.
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 2019,
  • [4] MULTIFACTOR PRODUCTIVITY - A NEW BLS MEASURE
    MARK, JA
    WALDORF, WH
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1983, 106 (12) : 3 - 15
  • [5] BLS MODERNIZES INDUSTRY LABOR PRODUCTIVITY PROGRAM
    KUNZE, K
    JABLONSKI, M
    KLARQUIST, V
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1995, 118 (07) : 3 - 12
  • [6] A major expansion of the BLS industry productivity program
    Duke, J
    Usher, L
    Kunze, K
    Devens, RM
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1999, 38 (01): : 106 - 110
  • [7] Comparing measures of overtime across BLS surveys
    Deleira, T
    Bhattacharya, J
    Macurdy, T
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2002, 41 (02): : 362 - 369
  • [8] HOURS AT WORK - A NEW BASE FOR BLS PRODUCTIVITY STATISTICS
    JABLONSKI, M
    KUNZE, K
    OTTO, PF
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1990, 113 (02) : 17 - 24
  • [9] BLS completes major expansion of industry productivity series
    Duke, J
    Usher, L
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1998, 121 (09) : 35 - 51
  • [10] BLS INTRODUCES NEW RANGE OF ALTERNATIVE UNEMPLOYMENT MEASURES
    BREGGER, JE
    HAUGEN, SE
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1995, 118 (10) : 19 - 26
12345