Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:47
|
作者
Aly, Omar E. [1 ]
Black, Douglas H. [1 ]
Rehman, Haroon [1 ]
Ahmed, Irfan [1 ]
机构
[1] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Surg, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, Scotland
关键词
Acute appendicitis; Laparoscopic; Single incision laparoscopic surgery; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; APPENDICITIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.087
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Appendicectomy is a well-established surgical procedure used in the management of acute appendicitis. The operation can be performed with minimally invasive surgery or as an open procedure. A further development in the minimally invasive appendicectomy technique has been the introduction of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILA). Aim: To ascertain any differences in outcomes from available trials comparing SILA with conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy (CLA). Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE/Ovid and CENTRAL for articles from Jan1990 to June 2015 with key words: 'appendectomy', 'appendicetomy'; 'appendicitis'; 'laparoscopy'; 'keyhole'; 'single port'; 'single incision'; 'single site'; 'one port'; 'incisionless'; 'scarless'. Randomised control trials of patients with signs and symptoms of appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy, with one arm being SILA were included. Statistical analysis was performed through Mantle-Haenszel and inverse variance methods. Results: A total of 8 RCTs published between 2012 and 2014 with a total of 995 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences between SILA and CLA for complication rates, postoperative ileus, length of hospital stay, return to work or post-operative pain. CLA was significantly superior to SILA with reduced operating time (mean difference 5.81 [2.01, 9.62] P = 0.003) and conversion rates (OR 4.14 [1.93, 8.91] P = 0.0003). SILA surgery had better wound cosmesis (mean difference 0.55 [0.33, 0.77] P = 0.00001). Conclusion: SILA is comparable to CLA in terms of complications, post-operative pain and recovery. Therefore, SILA could be a viable option in the hands of an experienced surgeons and for patients' groups who place great value on the final cosmetic outcome. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aly, O.
    Black, D.
    Rehman, H.
    Ahmed, I.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 194 - 194
  • [2] Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shafquat Zaman
    Ali Yasen Y. Mohamedahmed
    Stephen Stonelake
    Ananth Srinivasan
    Abdul Karim Sillah
    Shahab Hajibandeh
    Shahin Hajibandeh
    [J]. Pediatric Surgery International, 2021, 37 : 119 - 127
  • [3] Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zaman, Shafquat
    Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y.
    Stonelake, Stephen
    Srinivasan, Ananth
    Sillah, Abdul Karim
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 37 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [4] Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ding, Jie
    Xia, Yu
    Zhang, Zhong-min
    Liao, Guo-qing
    Pan, Yang
    Liu, Sheng
    Zhang, Yi
    Yan, Zhongshu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2013, 48 (05) : 1088 - 1098
  • [5] Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Lingling
    Liao, Zhenqi
    Feng, Shaoguang
    Wu, Peng
    Chen, Guorong
    [J]. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 31 (04) : 347 - 353
  • [6] Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lingling Zhao
    Zhenqi Liao
    Shaoguang Feng
    Peng Wu
    Guorong Chen
    [J]. Pediatric Surgery International, 2015, 31 : 347 - 353
  • [7] Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Zaman, Shafquat
    Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y.
    Srinivasan, Ananth
    Stonelake, Stephen
    Sillah, Abdul Karim
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2021, 19 (06): : 365 - 379
  • [8] Is transumbilical single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy both safe and effective when compared to standard three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis?
    Proctor, V.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 62 - 62
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy
    Markar, S. R.
    Karthikesalingam, A.
    Di Franco, F.
    Harris, A. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (13) : 1709 - 1718
  • [10] Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy - a randomised controlled trial
    Momin Malik
    Kirsty McCormack
    Zygmunt H Krukowski
    Alison McDonald
    Gladys McPherson
    Jonathan A Cook
    Irfan Ahmed
    [J]. Trials, 13