Experiences of COVID-19 infection in North Carolina: A qualitative analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Seidenfeld, Justine [1 ,2 ]
Tupetz, Anna [1 ]
Fiorino, Cassandra [3 ]
Limkakeng, Alexander [1 ]
Silva, Lincoln [4 ]
Staton, Catherine [1 ,4 ]
Vissoci, Joao R. N. [1 ,4 ]
Purakal, John [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Emergency Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Innovat Accelerate Discovery & Practice Trans, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Duke Global Hlth Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Durham, NC USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0269338
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and aim It has been demonstrated that marginalized populations across the U.S. have suffered a disproportionate burden of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, illustrating the role that social determinants of health play in health outcomes. To better understand how these vulnerable and high-risk populations have experienced the pandemic, we conducted a qualitative study to better understand their experiences from diagnosis through recovery. Methods We conducted a qualitative study of patients in a North Carolina healthcare system's registry who tested positive for COVID-19 from March 2020 through February 2021, identified from population-dense outbreaks of COVID-19 (hotspots). We conducted semi-structured phone interviews in English or Spanish, based on patient preference, with trained bilingual study personnel. Each interview was evaluated using a combination of deductive and inductive content analysis to determine prevalent themes related to COVID-19 knowledge, diagnosis, disease experience, and long-term impacts. Findings The 10 patients interviewed from our COVID-19 hotspot clusters were of equal distribution by sex, predominantly Black (70%), aged 22-70 years (IQR 45-62 years), and more frequently publicly insured (50% Medicaid/Medicare, vs 30% uninsured, vs 20% private insurance). Major themes identified included prior knowledge of COVID-19 and patient perceptions of their personal risk, the testing process in numerous settings, the process of quarantining at home after a positive diagnosis, the experience of receiving medical care during their illness, and difficulties with long-term recovery. Discussion Our findings suggest areas for targeted interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in these high-risk communities, as well as improve the patient experience throughout the COVID-19 illness course.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 Infection Experiences and Social Determinants of Health in North Carolina: A Qualitative Analysis
    Purakal, J. D.
    Seidenfeld, J.
    Tupetz, A.
    Vissoci, J.
    Silva, L.
    Limkakeng, A.
    Fiorino, C.
    Phillips, A.
    Staton, C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 78 (02) : S15 - S15
  • [2] COVID-19 Data Utilization in North Carolina: Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Experiences
    Patterson, Jenny Rees
    Shaw, Donna
    Thomas, Sharita R.
    Hayes, Julie A.
    Daley, Christopher R.
    Knight, Stefania
    Aikat, Jay
    Mieczkowska, Joanna O.
    Ahalt, Stanley C.
    Krishnamurthy, Ashok K.
    [J]. JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (09):
  • [3] Social Determinants of Health and COVID-19 Infection in North Carolina: A Geospatial Analysis
    Purakal, J. D.
    Silva, L.
    Tupetz, A.
    Seidenfeld, J.
    Limkakeng, A.
    Staton, C.
    Vissoci, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 78 (02) : S13 - S14
  • [4] COVID-19 Symptoms by Variant Period in the North Carolina COVID-19 Community Research Partnership, North Carolina, USA
    DeWitt, Michael E.
    Tjaden, Ashley H.
    Herrington, David
    Schieffelin, John
    Gibbs, Michael
    Weintraub, William S.
    Sanders, John W.
    Edelstein, Sharon L.
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 29 (01) : 207 - 211
  • [5] Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A qualitative analysis
    DeLuca, Nickolas
    Caruso, Elise
    Gupta, Reena
    Kemmerer, Charlene
    Coughlin, Rebecca
    Chan, Olivia
    Vohra, Divya
    Oeltmann, John E.
    Taylor, Melanie M.
    Moonan, Patrick K.
    Thorpe, Phoebe G.
    Loosier, Penny S.
    Haile, Geraldine
    [J]. SSM-QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH, 2023, 3
  • [6] Capturing the emotional and social experiences of COVID-19 through journal entries: A qualitative study of COVID-19 experiences over six weeks following infection
    Kenton, Natalie
    Gronowski, Benjamin
    Fish, Daniel
    Vartanian, Keri
    Robicsek, Ari
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [7] Use of Modeling to Inform Decision Making in North Carolina during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study
    Johnson, Karl
    Biddell, Caitlin B.
    Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
    Swann, Julie
    Delamater, Paul
    Mayorga, Maria
    Ivy, Julie
    Smith, Raymond L.
    Patel, Mehul D.
    [J]. MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2022, 7 (02)
  • [8] COVID-19 confessions: a qualitative exploration of healthcare workers experiences of working with COVID-19
    Bennett, Paul
    Noble, S.
    Johnston, Stephen
    Jones, David
    Hunter, Rachael
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [9] A qualitative analysis of the social impact of COVID-19 on college students in rural South Carolina
    Couch, Todd Christopher
    Molinari, Kiley Elizabeth
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM, 2022, 42 : S20 - S20
  • [10] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in underserved communities of North Carolina
    Doherty, Irene A.
    Pilkington, William
    Brown, Laurin
    Billings, Victoria
    Hoffler, Undi
    Paulin, Lisa
    Kimbro, K. Sean
    Baker, Brittany
    Zhang, Tianduo
    Locklear, Tracie
    Robinson, Seronda
    Kumar, Deepak
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):