Unfolding IRT Models for Likert-Type Items With a Don't Know Option

被引:12
|
作者
Liu, Chen-Wei [1 ]
Wang, Wen-Chung [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Educ, 10 Lo Ping Rd, Tai Po, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
item response unfolding models; nonignorable missing data; don't know option; MISSING-DATA; QUESTIONS; RESPONSES; PROGRAM; FIT;
D O I
10.1177/0146621616664047
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Attitude surveys are widely used in the social sciences. It has been argued that the underlying response process to attitude items may be more aligned with the ideal-point (unfolding) process than with the cumulative (dominance) process, and therefore, unfolding item response theory (IRT) models are more appropriate than dominance IRT models for these surveys. Missing data and don't know (DK) responses are common in attitude surveys, and they may not be ignorable in the likelihood for parameter estimation. Existing unfolding IRT models often treat missing data or DK as missing at random. In this study, a new class of unfolding IRT models for nonignorable missing data and DK were developed, in which the missingness and DK were assumed to measure a hierarchy of latent traits, which may be correlated with the latent attitude that a test intended to measure. The Bayesian approach with Markov chain Monte Carlo methods was used to estimate the parameters of the new models. Simulation studies demonstrated that the parameters were recovered fairly well, and ignoring nonignorable missingness or DK resulted in poor parameter estimates. An empirical example of a religious belief scale about health was given.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 533
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A New Multiprocess IRT Model With Ideal Points for Likert-Type Items
    Jin, Kuan-Yu
    Wu, Yi-Jhen
    Chen, Hui-Fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2022, 47 (03) : 297 - 321
  • [2] LIKERT-TYPE ITEMS VS CONTINUOUS ITEMS: WHICH OPTION IS BETTER?
    Garcia-Fernandez, Jaime
    Cuesta, Marcelino
    Postigo, Alvaro
    Menendez-Aller, Alvaro
    Gonzalez-Nuevo, Covadonga
    Garcia-Cueto, Eduardo
    [J]. REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2024, 82 (02):
  • [3] Ramsay curve IRT for Likert-type data
    Woods, Carol M.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2007, 31 (03) : 195 - 212
  • [4] To reverse or to not reverse Likert-type items: That is the question
    Vigil-Colet, Andreu
    Navarro-Gonzalez, David
    Morales-Vives, Fabia
    [J]. PSICOTHEMA, 2020, 32 (01) : 108 - 114
  • [5] Translation fidelity: An IRT analysis of Likert-type scale items from a culture change measure for Italian-Canadians
    Laroche, M
    Kim, C
    Tomiuk, MA
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL. XXV, 1998, 25 : 240 - 245
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF 3 WAYS OF PHRASING LIKERT-TYPE ATTITUDE ITEMS
    NORTH, WE
    SCHMID, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1960, 29 (01): : 95 - 100
  • [7] Deep Learning Imputation for Asymmetric and Incomplete Likert-Type Items
    Collier, Zachary K.
    Kong, Minji
    Soyoye, Olushola
    Chawla, Kamal
    Aviles, Ann M.
    Payne, Yasser
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2024, 49 (02) : 241 - 267
  • [8] The Performance of Multiple Imputation for Likert-type Items with Missing Data
    Leite, Walter
    Beretvas, S. Natasha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS, 2010, 9 (01) : 64 - 74
  • [9] A Two-Decision Model for Responses to Likert-Type Items
    Thissen-Roe, Anne
    Thissen, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2013, 38 (05) : 522 - 547
  • [10] Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items
    Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J
    Billiet, J
    Cambré, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 34 (06) : 702 - 722