Environmental responsibility, market valuation, and firm characteristics: Evidence from China

被引:50
|
作者
Hu, Junnan [1 ]
Wang, Shujing [2 ]
Xie, Feixue [3 ]
机构
[1] East China Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Dept Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas El Paso, Sch Business Adm, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; corporate governance; environmental engagement and policy; firm valuation and characteristics; stakeholders; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; GREEN INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; STRATEGY; IMPACT; PAY;
D O I
10.1002/csr.1646
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using a large panel of listed firms in China from 2010 to 2015, this study investigates the valuation effect of corporate environmental responsibility (CER) and firm characteristics that influence such an effect. We implement the ordinary least squares and the fixed effects panel regressions as well as the two-stage least squares regressions that control for potential endogeneity. We find that CER has a significantly positive effect on firm performance. The positive effect is more pronounced for firms in highly polluting industries, with high asset tangibility and with low state ownership. Furthermore, firms with high ownership concentration and low managerial ownership tend to benefit more from their environmentally responsible activities, suggesting that enhanced environmental engagement may serve as a strategic tool in reducing the negative effects of agency cost and weak corporate governance on firm valuation. Our results are robust to alternative measures of performance (Tobin's Q and return on assets).
引用
收藏
页码:1376 / 1387
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does environmental performance improve market valuation of the firm: evidence from Indian market
    Kumar S.
    Shetty S.
    [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2018, 20 (2) : 241 - 260
  • [2] Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Information Risk: Evidence from the Korean Market
    Choi, Daeheon
    Chung, Chune Young
    Kim, Dongnyoung
    Liu, Chang
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (22)
  • [3] Environmental Responsibility, External Assurance, and Firm Valuation
    Sharma, Divesh S.
    Sharma, Vineeta D.
    Litt, Barri A.
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2018, 37 (04): : 207 - 233
  • [4] The impact of market orientation and corporate social responsibility on firm performance Evidence from China
    Qu, Riliang
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2009, 21 (04) : 570 - 582
  • [5] Media Coverage and Firm Valuation: Evidence from China
    Jiwei Wang
    Kangtao Ye
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 127 : 501 - 511
  • [6] Media Coverage and Firm Valuation: Evidence from China
    Wang, Jiwei
    Ye, Kangtao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 127 (03) : 501 - 511
  • [7] Biotech firm valuation in an emerging market - evidence from Taiwan
    Chen, Angela Hsiang-Ling
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Lee, Jason Zu-Hsu
    Fu, Chun-Yuan
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 5 (02) : 92 - 102
  • [8] Is corporate environmental responsibility synergistic with governmental environmental responsibility? Evidence from China
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Jiefu
    Zeng, Huixiang
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (08) : 3669 - 3686
  • [9] Does corporate hedging affect firm valuation? Evidence from the IPO market
    Qiao, Zheng
    Xia, Chongwu
    Zhang, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2020, 40 (06) : 895 - 927
  • [10] Environmental regulation, market forces, and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from the implementation of cleaner production standards in China
    Hu, Jun
    Wu, Huiying
    Ying, Sammy Xiaoyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 150 : 606 - 622