Estimating Health-State Utility for Economic Models in Clinical Studies: An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report

被引:106
|
作者
Wolowacz, Sorrel E. [1 ]
Briggs, Andrew [2 ]
Belozeroff, Vasily [3 ]
Clarke, Philip [4 ]
Doward, Lynda [1 ]
Goeree, Ron [5 ,6 ]
Lloyd, Andrew [7 ]
Norman, Richard [8 ]
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment Res Grp, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Amgen Inc, Global Hlth Econ, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Policy, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Goeree Consulting Ltd, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Bladon Associates Ltd, Oxford, England
[8] Curtin Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Curtin, WA, Australia
关键词
economic model; health-utility; recommendations; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURES; CONTENT VALIDITY; PRO INSTRUMENTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; TRIALS; VALUATION; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2016.06.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cost-utility models are increasingly used in many countries to establish whether the cost of a new intervention can be justified in terms of health benefits. Health-state utility (HSU) estimates (the preference for a given state of health on a cardinal scale where 0 represents dead and 1 represents full health) are typically among the most important and uncertain data inputs in cost-utility models. Clinical trials represent an important opportunity for the collection of health-utility data. However, trials designed primarily to evaluate efficacy and safety often present challenges to the optimal collection of HSU estimates for economic models. Careful planning is needed to determine which of the HSU estimates may be measured in planned trials; to establish the optimal methodology; and to plan any additional studies needed. This report aimed to provide a framework for researchers to plan the collection of health-utility data in clinical studies to provide high-quality HSU estimates for economic modeling. Recommendations are made for early planning of health-utility data collection within a research and development program; design of health-utility data collection during protocol development for a planned clinical trial; design of prospective and cross-sectional observational studies and alternative study types; and statistical analyses and reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 719
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report
    Wailoo, Allan J.
    Hernandez-Alava, Monica
    Manca, Andrea
    Mejia, Aurelio
    Ray, Joshua
    Crawford, Bruce
    Botteman, Marc
    Busschbach, Jan
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [3] Transferability of Economic Evaluations Across Jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report
    Drummond, Michael
    Barbieri, Marco
    Cook, John
    Glick, Henry A.
    Lis, Joanna
    Malik, Farzana
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Rutten, Frans
    Sculpher, Mark
    Severens, Johan
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) : 409 - 418
  • [4] Identification, Review, and Use of Health State Utilities in Cost-Effectiveness Models: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report
    Brazier, John
    Ara, Roberta
    Azzabi, Ismail
    Busschbach, Jan
    Chevrou-Severac, Helene
    Crawford, Bruce
    Cruz, Luciane
    Karnon, John
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Paisley, Suzy
    Pickard, A. Simon
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (03) : 267 - 275
  • [5] Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report (vol 20, pg 18, 2017)
    Wailoo, Allan
    Alava, Monica Hernandez
    Manca, Andrea
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (08) : 1226 - 1226
  • [6] Prospective Observational Studies to Assess Comparative Effectiveness: The ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report
    Berger, Marc L.
    Dreyer, Nancy
    Anderson, Fred
    Towse, Adrian
    Sedrakyan, Art
    Normand, Sharon-Lise
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (02) : 217 - 230
  • [7] ISPOR Task Force For Clinical Outcomes Assessment: Clinical Outcome Assessments: Conceptual Foundation-Report of The ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment - Emerging Good Practices For Outcomes Research Task Force
    Coyne, Karin S.
    Wyrwich, Kathleen W.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (06) : 739 - 740
  • [8] The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report
    McGhan, William F.
    Al, Maiwenn
    Doshi, Jalpa A.
    Kamae, Isao
    Marx, Steven E.
    Rindress, Donna
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (08) : 1086 - 1099
  • [9] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [10] Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: Report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices-modeling studies
    Weinstein, MC
    O'Brien, B
    Hornberger, J
    Jackson, J
    Johannesson, M
    McCabe, C
    Luce, BR
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (01) : 9 - 17