Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines

被引:8
|
作者
Naismith, Sharon L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Michaelian, Johannes C. [1 ,2 ]
Low, Lee-Fay [4 ]
Arsenova, Valerie [5 ]
Mehrani, Inga [5 ]
Fyfe, Katrina [6 ]
Kochan, Nicole A. [5 ]
Kurrle, Susan E. [4 ]
Rowe, Christopher [7 ]
Sachdev, Perminder S. [5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Brain & Mind Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Brain & Mind Ctr, Hlth Brain Ageing Program, 94 Mallett St, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychiat, Ctr Hlth Brain Ageing CHeBA, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Western Australia, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[7] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hlth, Dept Mol Imaging & Therapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Prince Wales Hosp, Neuropsychiat Inst, Randwick, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Memory clinics (MCs); Current clinical practice; Dementia; Staffing; Referrals; Case conference; Feedback; Care plan development; Post-diagnostic care; Care plan implementation; Best practice; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; PRIMARY-CARE; EARLY-DIAGNOSIS; OLDER-ADULTS; DEMENTIA CARE; PEOPLE; INTERVENTION; US;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-022-03253-7
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Memory clinics (MCs) play a key role in accurate and timely diagnoses and treatment of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. However, within Australia, there are little data available on current practices in MCs, which hinder international comparisons for best practice, harmonisation efforts and national coordination. Here, we aimed to characterise current service profiles of Australian MCs. Methods The 'Australian Dementia Network Survey of Expert Opinion on Best Practice and the Current Clinical Landscape' was conducted between August-September 2020 as part of a larger-scale Delphi process deployed to develop national MC guidelines. In this study, we report on the subset of questions pertaining to current practice including wait-times and post-diagnostic care. Results Responses were received from 100 health professionals representing 60 separate clinics (45 public, 11 private, and 4 university/research clinics). The majority of participants were from clinics in metropolitan areas (79%) and in general were from high socioeconomic areas. While wait-times varied, only 28.3% of clinics were able to offer an appointment within 1-2 weeks for urgent referrals, with significantly more private clinics (58.3%) compared to public clinics (19.5%) being able to do so. Wait-times were less than 8 weeks for 34.5% of non-urgent referrals. Only 20.0 and 30.9% of clinics provided cognitive interventions or post-diagnostic support respectively, with 7.3% offering home-based reablement programs, and only 12.7% offering access to group-based education. Metropolitan clinics utilised neuropsychological assessments for a broader range of cases and were more likely to offer clinical trials and access to research opportunities. Conclusions In comparison to similar countries with comprehensive government-funded public healthcare systems (i.e., United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada), wait-times for Australian MCs are long, and post-diagnostic support or evidence-based strategies targeting cognition are not common practice. The timely and important results of this study highlight a need for Australian MCs to adopt a more holistic service of multidisciplinary assessment and post-diagnostic support, as well as the need for the number of Australian MCs to be increased to match the rising number of dementia cases.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
    Sharon L. Naismith
    Johannes C. Michaelian
    Lee-Fay Low
    Valerie Arsenova
    Inga Mehrani
    Katrina Fyfe
    Nicole A. Kochan
    Susan E. Kurrle
    Christopher Rowe
    Perminder S. Sachdev
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 22
  • [2] Innovation in practice: redeveloping the Australian national bibliographic service
    Missingham, R
    Boston, T
    [J]. ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2005, 23 (06): : 641 - 651
  • [3] NATIONAL NEEDS AND NATIONAL SERVICE
    EBERLY, DJ
    [J]. CURRENT HISTORY, 1968, 55 (324): : 65 - 71
  • [4] Australian perspectives on environmental practice: A national survey with human service professionals
    Boetto, Heather
    Bowles, Wendy
    Ramsay, Sylvia
    Shephard, Monique
    Cordoba, Pushkar Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2024,
  • [5] ALLERGY CLINICS IN THE NATIONAL-HEALTH-SERVICE
    HIDE, DW
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1990, 20 (03): : 327 - 327
  • [6] AN AUSTRALIAN VIEW OF A NATIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE
    GRIEVE, R
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1961, 85 (26) : 1395 - &
  • [7] THE AUSTRALIAN-NATIONAL-HEALTH-SERVICE
    不详
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL LABOUR REVIEW, 1956, 74 (03) : 279 - 289
  • [8] Caring for the underserved: Current practice of alumni of the National Health Service Corps
    Porterfield, DS
    Konrad, TR
    Porter, CQ
    Leysieffer, K
    Martinez, RM
    Niska, R
    Wells, B
    Potter, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2003, 14 (02) : 256 - 271
  • [9] The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service: The findings from a national auditing service
    Williams, I. M.
    Lye, J. E.
    Alves, A. D. C.
    Shaw, M. K.
    Keehan, S.
    Kenny, J.
    Lehmann, J. O.
    Dunn, L.
    Kron, T. K.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S722 - S723
  • [10] Australian clinical practice guidelines - a national study
    Buchan, Heather A.
    Currie, Kay C.
    Lourey, Emma J.
    Duggan, Geraint R.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 192 (09) : 490 - 494