Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol

被引:21
|
作者
Rimland, Joseph M. [1 ]
Abraha, Iosief [2 ]
Luchetta, Maria Laura [3 ]
Cozzolino, Francesco [2 ]
Orso, Massimiliano [2 ]
Cherubini, Antonio [1 ]
Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina [1 ]
Chiatti, Carlos [4 ]
Ambrosio, Giuseppe [5 ]
Montedori, Alessandro [2 ]
机构
[1] Italian Natl Res Ctr Aging, Geriatr & Geriatr Emergency Care, Ancona, Italy
[2] Hlth Planning Serv, Reg Hlth Author Umbria, Perugia, Italy
[3] Azienda USL Umbria 1, Gen Med, Perugia, Italy
[4] Italian Natl Res Ctr Aging, Sci Directorate, Ancona, Italy
[5] Univ Perugia, Dept Cardiol, Sch Med, Perugia, Italy
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
Administrative database; Chronic pulmonary obstructive disease; sensitivity and specificity; systematic review; Electronic Health Record; COPD algorithm; OUTCOMES; CLASSIFICATION; POPULATION; ACCURACY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Healthcare databases are useful sources to investigate the epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to assess longitudinal outcomes in patients with COPD, and to develop disease management strategies. However, in order to constitute a reliable source for research, healthcare databases need to be validated. The aim of this protocol is to perform the first systematic review of studies reporting the validation of codes related to COPD diagnoses in healthcare databases. Methods and analysis MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases will be searched using appropriate search strategies. Studies that evaluated the validity of COPD codes (such as the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision and 10th Revision system; the Real codes system or the International Classification of Primary Care) in healthcare databases will be included. Inclusion criteria will be: (1) the presence of a reference standard case definition for COPD; (2) the presence of at least one test measure (eg, sensitivity, positive predictive values, etc); and (3) the use of a healthcare database (including administrative claims databases, electronic healthcare databases or COPD registries) as a data source. Pairs of reviewers will independently abstract data using standardised forms and will assess quality using a checklist based on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD) criteria. This systematic review protocol has been produced in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. Results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. The results from this systematic review will be used for outcome research on COPD and will serve as a guide to identify appropriate case definitions of COPD, and reference standards, for researchers involved in validating healthcare databases. Trial registration number CRD42015029204.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recording in electronic health records: a systematic review protocol
    Stone, Philip
    Sood, Nikhil
    Feary, Johanna
    Roberts, C. Michael
    Quint, Jennifer K.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [2] Models for estimating projections for the prevalence and disease burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): systematic review protocol
    McLean, Susannah
    Wild, Sarah H.
    Simpson, Colin R.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (02): : PS8 - PS21
  • [3] Cost analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review
    Celia Gutiérrez Villegas
    María Paz-Zulueta
    Manuel Herrero-Montes
    Paula Parás-Bravo
    María Madrazo Pérez
    [J]. Health Economics Review, 11
  • [4] Serum bilirubin and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review
    David M. MacDonald
    Ken M. Kunisaki
    Timothy J. Wilt
    Arianne K. Baldomero
    [J]. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 21
  • [5] Serum bilirubin and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review
    MacDonald, David M.
    Kunisaki, Ken M.
    Wilt, Timothy J.
    Baldomero, Arianne K.
    [J]. BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [6] Extracellular vesicles and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review
    Gomez, Nancy
    James, Victoria
    Onion, David
    Fairclough, Lucy C.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [7] Extracellular vesicles and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review
    Nancy Gomez
    Victoria James
    David Onion
    Lucy C. Fairclough
    [J]. Respiratory Research, 23
  • [8] Telehealth for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Gaveikaite, Violeta
    Fischer, Claudia
    Schonenberg, Helen
    Pauws, Steffen
    Kitsiou, Spyros
    Chouvarda, Ioanna
    Maglaveras, Nicos
    Roca, Josep
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09):
  • [9] Cost analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review
    Gutierrez Villegas, Celia
    Paz-Zulueta, Maria
    Herrero-Montes, Manuel
    Paras-Bravo, Paula
    Madrazo Perez, Maria
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [10] Pulmonary rehabilitation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A systematic review
    Moore, Elizabeth
    Palmer, Thomas
    Newson, Roger
    Majeed, Azeeem
    Quint, Jennifer
    Soljak, Michael
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 48