Retrieval-mediated directed forgetting in the item-method paradigm: the effect of semantic cues

被引:8
|
作者
Marevic, Ivan [1 ]
Rummel, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Psychol, Hauptstr 47-51, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
关键词
STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; MEMORY; STORAGE; INHIBITION; CONTEXT; MODELS; LIST; RECOGNITION; INFORMATION; HYPOTHESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-018-1085-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Item-method directed forgetting is widely considered a storage phenomenon. However, by applying a multinomial model, which separates storage and retrieval effect components, Rummel et al. (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 42(10):1526-1543, 2016) recently provided evidence that item-method directed forgetting effects are reflected by both storage and retrieval changes. The current investigation demonstrates that supposedly intentionally forgotten information can still be retrieved to some extent when semantic cuing facilitates retrieval of this information. Participants studied word pairs, with some pairs being followed by a "forget" and others by a "remember" instruction. A subset of items shared the same superordinate semantic category. In Experiment 1, a sub-portion of to-be-forgotten items was semantically related and less forgetting occurred selectively for these items when the category was reinstated during test. This finding was replicated and extended to reinstatement effects for to-be-remembered items in Experiment 2. The application of the storage-retrieval model confirmed that providing a category cue facilitates retrieval of to-be-forgotten as well as to-be-remembered information. The results are discussed in light of existing theories of directed forgetting.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 705
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retrieval-mediated directed forgetting in the item-method paradigm: the effect of semantic cues
    Ivan Marevic
    Jan Rummel
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2020, 84 : 685 - 705
  • [2] Forgetting cues are ineffective in promoting forgetting in the item-method directed forgetting paradigm
    Gao, Heming
    Qi, Mingming
    Zhang, Qi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 144 : 25 - 33
  • [3] Item-method directed forgetting: Effects at retrieval?
    Taylor, Tracy L.
    Cutmore, Laura
    Pries, Lotta
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 183 : 116 - 123
  • [4] Mood states effect retrieval not encoding in item-method directed forgetting
    Goernert, Phillip N.
    Corenblum, Barry
    Watier, Nicholas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 33 (04) : 424 - 438
  • [5] Separation of item and context in item-method directed forgetting
    Chiu, Yi-Chieh
    Wang, Tracy H.
    Beck, Diane M.
    Lewis-Peacock, Jarrod A.
    Sahakyan, Lili
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2021, 235
  • [6] Metacognition Influences Item-Method Directed Forgetting
    Foster, Nathaniel L.
    Sahakyan, Lili
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 38 (05) : 1309 - 1324
  • [7] Inhibitory processes in item-method directed forgetting
    Fawcett, Jonathan
    Taylor, Tracy
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2008, 62 (04): : 269 - 269
  • [8] Remember to forget: ERP evidence for inhibition in an item-method directed forgetting paradigm
    van Hooff, Johanna C.
    Ford, Ruth M.
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 1392 : 80 - 92
  • [9] Costs and Benefits in Item-Method Directed Forgetting: Differential Effects of Encoding and Retrieval
    Lee, Yuh-Shiow
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 140 (03): : 159 - 173
  • [10] Cognitive load hypothesis of item-method directed forgetting
    Lee, Yuh-Shiow
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (06): : 1110 - 1122