Is the biopsy Gleason score reliably predictive for the Gleason score of the whole prostate?

被引:0
|
作者
Sonnleithner, M. [1 ]
Gruendler, T. [2 ]
Stoiber, F. [3 ]
Loidl, W. [3 ]
Sommerer, E. [4 ]
Meixl, H. [5 ]
Jeschke, K. [5 ]
Galle, G.
Mauermann, J. [6 ]
Scheber, K. [7 ]
Grubmueller, K. [8 ]
Kheyfts, O. [9 ]
Wimpissinger, F. [9 ]
Huber, G. [10 ]
Schmidt, P. [11 ]
Bucher, A. [12 ]
Karpf, R. [13 ]
Hermandinger, G. [14 ]
Scholz, M. [1 ]
Hoeltl, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] KFJ, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[2] BB, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[3] BS Linz, Dept Urol, Linz, Austria
[4] LKH St Poelten, Dept Urol, St Poelten, Australia
[5] LKH Klagenfurt, Dept Urol, Klagenfurt, Austria
[6] Graz Univ, Dept Urol, Graz, Austria
[7] AKH Wien, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[8] LK Krems, Dept Urol, Krems, Austria
[9] Rudolstiftung, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[10] LK Baden, Dept Urol, Baden, Austria
[11] Hietzing, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[12] HKH Wien, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[13] LK Weinviertel, Dept Urol, Mistelbach, Austria
[14] LK Voecklabruck, Dept Urol, Voeklabruck, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1569-9056(08)60932-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
935
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 305
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE WEIGHTED GLEASON SCORE OF PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS IMPROVES THE PREDICTION OF PATHOLOGIC GLEASON SCORE
    Cho, Eric
    Kaplan, Joshua
    Harbin, Andrew
    Kamenko, Anastasiya
    Ramsey, Frederick
    Mydlo, Jack
    Eun, Daniel
    Reese, Adam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E244 - E244
  • [2] Is Gleason score in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy consistent with Gleason score in radical prostatectomy?
    Karabicak, Mustafa
    Turk, Hakan
    Ergani, Batuhan
    Kozacioglu, Zafer
    Koc, Gokhan
    Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem
    [J]. KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 53 (02): : 145 - 149
  • [3] Global Gleason score, highest core Gleason score, or weighted Gleason score: What Gleason score should be reported in prostate needle biopsies?
    Rubin, MA
    Zhou, M
    Ingold, C
    Shah, R
    Dunn, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 224 - 224
  • [4] Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score Correlation in Heterogenous Tumors Proposal for a Composite Gleason Score
    Arias-Stella, Javier A.
    Shah, Alpa B.
    Montoya-Cerrillo, Diego
    Williamson, Sean R.
    Gupta, Nilesh S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 39 (09) : 1213 - 1218
  • [5] Global Gleason score, highest core Gleason score, or weighted Gleason score: What Gleason score should be reported in prostate needle biopsies?
    Dunn, RL
    Shah, R
    Zhou, M
    Ingold, C
    Rubin, MA
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 82 (01) : 161A - 161A
  • [6] Global Gleason score, highest core Gleason score, or weighted Gleason score: What Gleason score should be reported in prostate needle biopsies?
    Dunn, RL
    Shah, R
    Zhou, M
    Ingold, C
    Rubin, MA
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 161A - 161A
  • [7] Risk of disparity between needle biopsy Gleason score and final pathologic Gleason score is not correlated with prostate volume
    McCann, TR
    Wosnitzer, MS
    McKiernan, JM
    Benson, MC
    Olsson, CA
    Goluboff, ET
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 481 - 481
  • [8] Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score
    Coogan, CL
    Latchamsetty, KC
    Greenfield, J
    Corman, JM
    Lynch, B
    Porter, CR
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (03) : 324 - 327
  • [9] Predictive factors of north Chinese patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7 upgrading to a higher prostatectomy Gleason score
    Liu, S.
    Li, X.
    Liu, H.
    Fu, Q.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 177 - 177
  • [10] IMPROVED CONCORDANCE OF BIOPSY AND PATHOLOGICAL GLEASON SCORE USING QUANTITATIVE GLEASON GRADING OF PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS
    Reese, Adam
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Cowan, Janet
    Brajtbord, Jonathan
    Harris, Catherine
    Carroll, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E79 - E79