Apps With Maps-Anxiety and Depression Mobile Apps With Evidence-Based Frameworks: Systematic Search of Major App Stores

被引:35
|
作者
Marshall, Jamie M. [1 ]
Dunstan, Debra A. [1 ]
Bartik, Warren [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Psychol, Elm Ave, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
来源
JMIR MENTAL HEALTH | 2020年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
mHealth; apps; app store; depression; anxiety; e-mental health; smartphone; mobile mental health; digital mental health; mobile phone; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; SELF-HELP; 3RD WAVE; HEALTH; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; INTERVENTION; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.2196/16525
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Mobile mental health apps have become ubiquitous tools to assist people in managing symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, due to the lack of research and expert input that has accompanied the development of most apps, concerns have been raised by clinicians, researchers, and government authorities about their efficacy. Objective: This review aimed to estimate the proportion of mental health apps offering comprehensive therapeutic treatments for anxiety and/or depression available in the app stores that have been developed using evidence-based frameworks. It also aimed to estimate the proportions of specific frameworks being used in an effort to understand which frameworks are having the most influence on app developers in this area. Methods: A systematic review of the Apple App Store and Google Play store was performed to identify apps offering comprehensive therapeutic interventions that targeted anxiety and/or depression. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist was adapted to guide this approach. Results: Of the 293 apps shortlisted as offering a therapeutic treatment for anxiety and/or depression, 162 (55.3%) mentioned an evidence-based framework in their app store descriptions. Of the 293 apps, 88 (30.0%) claimed to use cognitive behavioral therapy techniques, 46 (15.7%) claimed to use mindfulness, 27 (9.2%) claimed to use positive psychology, 10 (3.4%) claimed to use dialectical behavior therapy, 5 (1.7%) claimed to use acceptance and commitment therapy, and 20 (6.8%) claimed to use other techniques. Of the 162 apps that claimed to use a theoretical framework, only 10 (6.2%) had published evidence for their efficacy. Conclusions: The current proportion of apps developed using evidence-based frameworks is unacceptably low, and those without tested frameworks may be ineffective, or worse, pose a risk of harm to users. Future research should establish what other factors work in conjunction with evidence-based frameworks to produce efficacious mental health apps.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Digital Psychiatrist: In Search of Evidence-Based Apps for Anxiety and Depression
    Marshall, Jamie M.
    Dunstan, Debra A.
    Bartik, Warren
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 10
  • [2] Psychoeducational Social Anxiety Mobile Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores, Content Analysis, and Evaluation
    Hammond, Trent Ernest
    Lampe, Lisa
    Campbell, Andrew
    Perisic, Steve
    Brakoulias, Vlasios
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (09):
  • [3] Mobile Apps for Blood Pressure Monitoring: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis
    Jamaladin, Hussein
    van de Belt, Tom H.
    Luijpers, Lianda C. H.
    de Graaff, Falco R.
    Bredie, Sebastian J. H.
    Roeleveld, Nel
    van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J.
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (11):
  • [4] Mobile Phone Apps in Australia for Improving Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Search on App Stores
    Musgrave, Loretta M.
    Kizirian, Nathalie, V
    Homer, Caroline S. E.
    Gordon, Adrienne
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (11):
  • [5] Mobile Applications (Apps) to Support the Hepatitis C Treatment: A Systematic Search in App Stores
    Aline Teotonio Rodrigues
    Camila Tavares Sousa
    João Pereira
    Isabel Vitória Figueiredo
    Tácio de Mendonça Lima
    [J]. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2021, 55 : 152 - 162
  • [6] Mobile Applications (Apps) to Support the Hepatitis C Treatment: A Systematic Search in App Stores
    Rodrigues, Aline Teotonio
    Sousa, Camila Tavares
    Pereira, Joao
    Figueiredo, Isabel Vitoria
    Lima, Tacio de Mendonca
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2021, 55 (01) : 152 - 162
  • [7] Mobile Apps for the Management of Gastrointestinal Diseases: Systematic Search and Evaluation Within App Stores
    Messner, Eva-Maria
    Sturm, Niklas
    Terhorst, Yannik
    Sander, Lasse B.
    Schultchen, Dana
    Portenhauser, Alexandra
    Schmidbaur, Simone
    Stach, Michael
    Klaus, Jochen
    Baumeister, Harald
    Walter, Benjamin M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (10)
  • [8] Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
    Cheah, Khang Jin
    Manaf, Zahara Abdul
    Ludin, Arimi Fitri Mat
    Razalli, Nurul Huda
    Mokhtar, Norfilza Mohd
    Ali, Sawal Hamid Md
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [9] Mobile Phone Apps for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Prevention and Response: Systematic Search on App Stores
    Moret, Jessica Draughon
    Todd, Angela
    Rose, Lauren
    Pollitt, Erin
    Anderson, Jocelyn
    [J]. JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (02)
  • [10] The Quality of Mobile Apps Used for the Identification of Pressure Ulcers in Adults: Systematic Survey and Review of Apps in App Stores
    Koepp, Janine
    Baron, Miriam Viviane
    Hernandes Martins, Paulo Ricardo
    Brandenburg, Cristine
    Frare Kira, Ariane Tieko
    Trindade, Vanessa Devens
    Ley Dominguez, Luis Manuel
    Carneiro, Marcelo
    Frozza, Rejane
    Possuelo, Lia Goncalves
    De Mello Pinto, Marcus Vinicius
    Kipper, Liane Mahlmann
    Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercilia
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (06):