Adult Age Differences in the Benefit of Syntactic and Semantic Constraints for Sentence Processing

被引:11
|
作者
Beese, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Werkle-Bergner, Markus [3 ]
Lindenberger, Ulman [3 ,4 ]
Friederici, Angela D. [1 ]
Meyer, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Dept Neuropsychol, Stephanstr 1A, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Berlin, Germany
[3] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Lifespan Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[4] Max Planck UCL Ctr Computat Psychiat & Ageing Res, Berlin, Germany
关键词
aging; chunking; semantics; syntax; working memory; WORKING-MEMORY; LIFE-SPAN; OLDER-ADULTS; CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; EPISODIC MEMORY; WORD-FREQUENCY; NEURAL BASIS; GARDEN-PATH; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1037/pag0000300
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Verbal working memory-intensive sentence processing declines with age. This might reflect older adults' difficulties with reducing the memory load by grouping single words into multiword chunks. Here we used a serial order task emphasizing syntactic and semantic relations. We evaluated the extent to which older compared with younger adults may differentially use linguistic constraints during sentence processing to cope with verbal working memory limitations. Probing syntactic-semantic interactions, age differences were hypothesized to be confined to the use of syntactic constraints and to be accompanied by an increased reliance on semantic information. Two experiments varying in verbal working memory demands were conducted: the sequence length was increased from eight items in Experiment 1 to 11 items in Experiment 2. We found the use of syntactic constraints to be compromised with aging, while the benefit of semantic information for sentence processing was comparable across age groups. Hence, we suggest that semantic information processing may become relatively more important for successful sentence processing with advancing adult age, possibly inducing a syntactic-to-semantic-processing strategy shift.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 55
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Age differences in the recruitment of syntactic analysis and semantic plausibility during sentence comprehension
    Liu, Xinmiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 151 (04): : 444 - 466
  • [2] SEMANTIC CONSTRAINTS ON SENTENCE PROCESSING TIME AND COMPLEXITY
    ROSENBERG, S
    HAMILTON, R
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1975, 6 (NB4) : 428 - 428
  • [3] The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An ERP study
    Ye, Zheng
    Zhan, Weidong
    Zhou, Xiaolin
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1142 : 135 - 145
  • [4] DISTINCT PUPILLARY AND NEURAL RESPONSES TO SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC VIOLATIONS IN SENTENCE PROCESSING
    LoTemplio, Sara
    Silcox, Jack
    Federmeier, Kara
    Payne, Brennan
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 57 : S31 - S31
  • [5] Adult age differences in the effects of goals on self-regulated sentence processing
    Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.
    Shake, Matthew C.
    Miles, Joseph R.
    Noh, Soo Rim
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2006, 21 (04) : 790 - 803
  • [6] GRAMMATICAL CONSTRAINTS IN SYNTACTIC PROCESSING, SENTENCE-MATCHING EXPERIMENTS ON GERMAN
    CLAHSEN, H
    HONG, U
    SONNENSTUHLHENNING, I
    [J]. LINGUISTIC REVIEW, 1995, 12 (01): : 5 - 33
  • [7] Differences in semantic and syntactic processing in foreign language acquisition
    Hahne, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, : 51 - 51
  • [8] Stuttering and Natural Speech Processing of Semantic and Syntactic Constraints on Verbs
    Weber-Fox, Christine
    Hampton, Amanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (05): : 1058 - 1071
  • [9] Effects of age and speed of processing on rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension
    Caplan, D
    Waters, G
    Alpert, N
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2003, 19 (02) : 112 - 131
  • [10] Age differences in on-line syntactic processing
    Stine-Morrow, EAL
    Ryan, S
    Leonard, JS
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2000, 26 (04) : 315 - 322