Public sector implementation strategies to approach the judicialization of health care: a systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki [1 ]
Maia Barreto, Jorge Otavio [2 ]
Barberato-Filho, Silvio [1 ]
da Silva Machado, Fernanda Lacerda [3 ]
Lopes, Luciane Cruz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sorocaba, Grad Program Pharmaceut Sci, Rodovia Raposo Tavares,Km 92 5, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Fiocruz MS, Oswaldo Cruz Fdn, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[3] UFRJ, Fed Univ Rio De Janeiro, Macae, Brazil
关键词
Judicialization of health care; Organization and administration; Public health; Lawsuits and litigation; Justice administration system; Delivery of health care; Health systems;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-022-02043-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The judicialization of health care can be understood as a societal response to pressing healthcare needs, which probably are not being adequately addressed by the current healthcare system. This phenomenon increases the strain on service resources, both in the health sector and in the judiciary system as well, demanding an institutional reorganization to manage judicial actions. It is believed that each institution has developed strategies for coping with the problem in isolation and with little public disclosure. The purpose of this review will be to identify institutional strategies implemented and to investigate their effects in approaching the judicialization of health care. Methods: Electronic searches will be conducted up to December 2021 on 11 databases, supplemented with gray literature and references lists of secondary studies. The descriptor "judicialization of health" will be the basis for conducting the main research. Studies describing any strategy implemented by public institutions to approach the judicialization of health care will be included. Results related to the quality of services provided by the implemented strategy reported in the studies and those that report accessibility, usability, and potential adverse effects or harms caused by the implemented strategy will be investigated. In addition, it will be explored if there have been changes related to the value or characteristics of health litigation. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstract data, and full-text papers. The risk of bias in each study will be appraised using a tool suggested by Cochrane Effective Practice and Care Organization Group (EPOC). Subsequently, the reviewers will also extract the data of interest and classify the findings of these studies according to their performance at the institutional level. The results obtained will be described as a narrative synthesis. Discussion: This review may provide evidence on the effects of the strategies implemented to approach the judicialization of health care. It will potentially benefit health care and legal professionals, decision-makers, and researchers by identifying the types and characteristics of strategies that have the potential to improve service delivery in the future. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020160608
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public sector implementation strategies to approach the judicialization of health care: a systematic review protocol
    Sueli Miyuki Yamauti
    Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
    Silvio Barberato-Filho
    Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado
    Luciane Cruz Lopes
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [2] Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki
    Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia
    Barberato-Filho, Silvio
    Lopes, Luciane Cruz
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [3] Judicialization of health in the public and private health systems: a systematic review
    de Freitas, Beatriz Cristina
    da Fonseca, Emilio Prado
    Queluz, Dagmar de Paula
    [J]. INTERFACE-COMUNICACAO SAUDE EDUCACAO, 2020, 24
  • [4] Blockchain Implementation in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
    Meinert, Edward
    Alturkistani, Abrar
    Foley, Kimberley A.
    Osama, Tasnime
    Car, Josip
    Majeed, Azeem
    Van Velthoven, Michelle
    Wells, Glenn
    Brindley, David
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (02): : 153 - 159
  • [5] Regulatory mechanisms for absenteeism in the health sector: a systematic review of strategies and their implementation
    Kisakye, Angela N.
    Tweheyo, Raymond
    Ssengooba, Freddie
    Pariyo, George W.
    Rutebemberwa, Elizeus
    Kiwanuka, Suzanne N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP, 2016, 8 : 81 - 94
  • [6] Social Media for e-Government in the Public Health Sector: Protocol for a Systematic Review
    Franco, Massimo
    Tursunbayeva, Aizhan
    Pagliari, Claudia
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2016, 5 (01):
  • [7] Public-Private Partnerships in the Health Care Sector: A systematic review of the literature
    Torchia, Mariateresa
    Calabro, Andrea
    Morner, Michele
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (02) : 236 - 261
  • [8] Implementation Strategies for Knowledge Products in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Uwizeye, Claude Bernard
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Bussieres, Andre
    Thomas, Aliki
    Kairy, Dahlia
    Massougbodji, Jose
    Rheault, Nathalie
    Tchoubi, Sebastien
    Philibert, Leonel
    Gaye, Serigne Abib
    Khadraoui, Lobna
    Ben Charif, Ali
    Diendere, Ella
    Langlois, Lea
    Dugas, Michele
    Legare, France
    [J]. INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [9] Effectiveness of implementation strategies for the improvement of guideline and protocol adherence in emergency care: a systematic review
    Ebben, Remco H. A.
    Siqeca, Flaka
    Madsen, Ulla Riis
    Vloet, Lilian C. M.
    van Achterberg, Theo
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (11):
  • [10] Workplace mental health implementation strategies in public safety organizations: a scoping review protocol
    Edgelow, Megan
    Mckinley, Lauren
    McPherson, Matthew
    Mehta, Sonam
    Ortlieb, Aquila
    Scholefield, Emma
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (01) : 229 - 237