Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems

被引:905
|
作者
Haberl, Helmut
Erb, K. Heinz
Krausmann, Fridolin
Gaube, Veronika
Bondeau, Alberte
Plutzar, Christoph
Gingrich, Simone
Lucht, Wolfgang
Fischer-Kowalski, Marina
机构
[1] Klagenfurt Univ, Inst Social Ecol, A-1070 Vienna, Austria
[2] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Vienna Inst Nat Conservat & Anal, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
biomass; global environmental change; human impact; biosphere; land use;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0704243104
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP), the aggregate impact of land use on biomass available each year in ecosystems, is a prominent measure of the human domination of the biosphere. We present a comprehensive assessment of global HANPP based on vegetation modeling, agricultural and forestry statistics, and geographical information systems data on land use, land cover, and soil degradation that localizes human impact on ecosystems. We found an aggregate global HANPP value of 15.6 Pg C/yr or 23.8% of potential net primary productivity, of which 53% was contributed by harvest, 40% by land-use-induced productivity changes, and 7% by human-induced fires. This is a remarkable impact on the biosphere caused by just one species. We present maps quantifying human-induced changes in trophic energy flows in ecosystems that illustrate spatial patterns in the human domination of ecosystems, thus emphasizing land use as a pervasive factor of global importance. Land use transforms earth's terrestrial surface, resulting in changes in biogeochemical cycles and in the ability of ecosystems to deliver services critical to human well being. The results suggest that large-scale schemes to substitute biomass for fossil fuels should be viewed cautiously because massive additional pressures on ecosystems might result from increased biomass harvest.
引用
收藏
页码:12942 / 12945
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying and Mapping Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity in Qinghai Grasslands in China
    Huang, Xiaotao
    Yang, Yongsheng
    Chen, Chunbo
    Zhao, Hongfei
    Yao, Buqing
    Ma, Zhen
    Ma, Li
    Zhou, Huakun
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [2] Human appropriation of net primary production
    Haberl, H
    Krausmann, F
    Erb, KH
    Schulz, NB
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5575) : 1968 - 1969
  • [3] Appropriation of potential net primary production by cropland in terrestrial ecoregions
    Medkova, Helena
    Vackar, David
    Weinzettel, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 150 : 294 - 300
  • [4] Human appropriation of net primary production - Response
    Rojstaczer, S
    Sterling, SM
    Moore, N
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5575) : 1969 - 1969
  • [5] Mapping human appropriation of net primary production in agroecosystems in the Heihe River Basin, China
    Liu, Yaqun
    Song, Wei
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 335
  • [6] Net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems from 2000 to 2009
    Potter, Christopher
    Klooster, Steven
    Genovese, Vanessa
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 115 (02) : 365 - 378
  • [7] Net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems from 2000 to 2009
    Christopher Potter
    Steven Klooster
    Vanessa Genovese
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2012, 115 : 365 - 378
  • [8] Water use efficiency of net primary production in global terrestrial ecosystems
    Xia, Lei
    Wang, Fei
    Mu, Xingmin
    Jin, Kai
    Sun, Wenyi
    Gao, Peng
    Zhao, Guangju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2015, 124 (05) : 921 - 931
  • [9] Carbon dioxide emissions and net primary production of Russian terrestrial ecosystems
    V. N. Kudeyarov
    I. N. Kurganova
    [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1998, 27 : 246 - 250
  • [10] Trajectories in human domination of ecosystems: Human appropriation of net primary production in the Philippines during the 20th century
    Kastner, Thomas
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 69 (02) : 260 - 269